Super User Fishing Rhino Posted May 19, 2009 Super User Posted May 19, 2009 Yesterday, I caught a clam on a Rage Tail Space Monkey. As the weighted keel of the hook passed throught the open bivalve, the clam clamped down on it. Drat, I did not have my cell phone with me to take a pic. Anyone can make up a story like that. Today, I made sure I brought my cell phone with me. What are the odds of a repeat. Lo and behold, this time, the Rage Tail Lizard was the bait. Not only did the clam clamp on the weight and the hook, it also grabbed a bit of the lizard. The pics aren't the best quality. Sorry 'bout that. Quote
BassNub Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 haha i guess not only it catches bass but, muscles too! hahah Quote
CRFisher Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 I had that same thing happen a few weeks ago deadsticking a fluke. Quote
Big Mike in Fl Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 that's a good thing...that means you're fishing over a mussel bed, which means you should be producing fish as well, I'm not sure if they close like that to feed, or if it's a protection thing, but whatever the case, you're bait being there isn't necessarily a bad thing Quote
Super User Maxximus Redneckus Posted May 20, 2009 Super User Posted May 20, 2009 RAGE TAILS are EXTROIDINARY they are the second coming Quote
BassResource.com Administrator Glenn Posted May 20, 2009 BassResource.com Administrator Posted May 20, 2009 Keri caught a clam on a crankbait a few years ago. Thought it only happened to us. Quote
Super User Fishing Rhino Posted May 20, 2009 Author Super User Posted May 20, 2009 that's a good thing...that means you're fishing over a mussel bed, which means you should be producing fish as well, I'm not sure if they close like that to feed, or if it's a protection thing, but whatever the case, you're bait being there isn't necessarily a bad thing It's definitely a defense reaction, triggered by an invader. It appears they are called clams or mussels. Being an old salt, the mussels I'm familiar with attach themselves to the bottom and other structure with byssal threads. These anchor themselves by burrowing into the bottom with approximately half their shell exposed. For sure, the otters around the pond love them, and perhaps the muskrats as well, though I thought muskrats were vegetarians. There are several muskrat condos around the shoreline of the pond. Near these mounds, on the mat of dormant aquatic vines are piles of shells. Obviously something has been eating them. I would imagine that they are a food source for snapping turtles. They are plentiful and easily obtained. It's not uncommon for the mushroom anchor to come up with a clam it "dredged up" from the bottom. Being filter feeders, clams must play an important role in the natural purification of the pond's waters. An interesting article, which may explain why the pond I fish most often has an algae bloom which it never had years ago. http://www.glsc.usgs.gov/_files/factsheets/2000-5%20Clams.pdf Some attribute it to a development which was built a few years ago, increasing the flow of nutrients into the pond. But I doubt that because years ago, farms around the pond had, in total, several hundred head of dairy cows that grazed in the fields that abut the pond. All these fields sloped to the pond. Further, the cows would often wade in the pond to cool off on hot days. It seems more likely to me, that, based on the article, a decline in the clam/mussel population, is responsible for the algae bloom. It seemed to me that there were not as many clams as I had seen back in the '60s. There are definitely more otters around the pond. I see a few every day. Back in the day, I didn't see any. No doubt there may have been some, but not in the numbers so obvious today. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.