TheHammer84 Posted August 26, 2009 Posted August 26, 2009 I love watching Mike Iaconelli he is a blast to watch UUUUUUUGGGGGGG!!!!!! He didn't just write that? I don't see what the big deal is. Quote
basser89 Posted August 26, 2009 Posted August 26, 2009 Doesn't *** have a points system for ranking that covers all the pros? And yes, KVD is "on the top of the food chain" there. :D Quote
Super User 5bass Posted August 26, 2009 Super User Posted August 26, 2009 I have to say Al Lindner. In my opinion KVD would have his hands full if Lindner fished the Elite Tour.....no disrespect to KVD of course, he's a true bass fishing machine. Quote
bigtimfish Posted August 26, 2009 Posted August 26, 2009 The best, KVD My favorites, Ike and Jeff Kreit Quote
broncoboxer Posted August 26, 2009 Posted August 26, 2009 I love watching Mike Iaconelli he is a blast to watch UUUUUUUGGGGGGG!!!!!! He didn't just write that? Yeah, he did. And I agree with him. Quote
dave Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Not going to jump into this winless race...kvd Quote
dave Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Although I do agree with the post about the insufferable Mr. Roland Martin. Nine angler of the year trophies don't lie. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 What is Al Lindner's story? I just realized that even though I watch his show all the time, I know pretty much nothing about him. Quote
Mattlures Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Mike Long He has many lake records. He has caught more documented bass over 15 lbs then anybody. I think is up around 60 He dominates the So Cal Tournament scene and he ofter wins team tournaments fishing by himself. After Mike would be KVD, Skeet , Ike and Aaron followed by the first generation of big pros Clunn ,Roland and Dance. Quote
Super User 5bass Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 What is Al Lindner's story? Here's the story. Al Lindner rules. The End. Quote
dmac14 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 You guys forgot Ish Monroe. Easily the most informative angler available on the elite series. But in all seriousness Bill Dance is really high in my book, the way he still teaches. And when he was in Bassmaster for 'A day on the lake' he did pretty good. Roland Marten lost all credibility with his pocket rocket fisherman. I think KVD shines so much now because of the media and the increase in fan base. You can show as many stats as you would like about people, stats are just that; stats. They show how well an angler did against the significantly greater than the past. Its all just going to remain a mystery as to whose the best. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 What is Al Lindner's story? Here's the story. Al Lindner rules. The End. LMAO ;D Gotcha Quote
Super User Dan: Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 You can show as many stats as you would like about people, stats are just that; stats. They show how well an angler did against the significantly greater than the past. ???? And stats are the measurements of success, they show a lot. Sure, there are intangibles, but when it comes to who is the best tourney fisherman, stats about wins HAVE to matter. Quote
dmac14 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 To a point. If we are just looking at stats to find the best than it wouldnt be to hard, KVD. Best percentage to be in the top ten, 37.4% of tournaments he will place in the top ten. Rick Clunn is only at 28.7%. Wins just show how you did amongst that group of competitors. I could go out and win all my club tournaments and my stats would be the best, for that club. But if I join another club and fish the same lakes but finish in last all the time then it shows my stats were just based on the competitors. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 To a point. If we are just looking at stats to find the best than it wouldnt be to hard, KVD. Best percentage to be in the top ten, 37.4% of tournaments he will place in the top ten. Rick Clunn is only at 28.7%. Wins just show how you did amongst that group of competitors. I could go out and win all my club tournaments and my stats would be the best, for that club. But if I join another club and fish the same lakes but finish in last all the time then it shows my stats were just based on the competitors. But these guys are both fishing the Elite Series. Rick Clunn has fished it longer but I would think if anything the competition is better now that it was before KVD started. Quote
Super User Tin Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 KVD finishes in the money by.. A. Cranking/Jerking B. Shakey Head fishing C. Spinnerbaiting Ike finishes in the money by junk fishing and using anything necessary to catch fish. I have seen that guy catch fish on swimbaits, using football jigs, tubes, drop-shottting, cranking, worming, flipping and pitching. I think Ike is the better fisherman because he can catch fish on any bait at any time. Where as KVD has just mastered a certain 3 (Kind of like Clunn) bait to catch them. Quote
Super User Hammer 4 Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 Stats alone aren't always a measure of a person's sucess.. Quote
Super User cart7t Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 Fishing in 69 tournaments, Martin's BASSMASTER career includes the following achievements - 19 tournaments won, 9 B.A.S.S. Angler-of-the-Year titles, nearly 100 Top Ten finishes, and 25 appearances in bass fishing's world championship event, the BASS Masters Classic. Also a record, he has twenty 2nd place BASS finishes. His career tournament winnings exceeded one million dollars in 2004. During his dominating years, Roland finished in either 1st or second in over 50% of the tournaments he fished! That's domination that no other angler has even come close to including KVD. Bazooka fishing rod aside. Quote
Super User Muddy Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 To a point. If we are just looking at stats to find the best than it wouldnt be to hard, KVD. Best percentage to be in the top ten, 37.4% of tournaments he will place in the top ten. Rick Clunn is only at 28.7%. Wins just show how you did amongst that group of competitors. I could go out and win all my club tournaments and my stats would be the best, for that club. But if I join another club and fish the same lakes but finish in last all the time then it shows my stats were just based on the competitors. On a professional level of any sport it's all about Stats:Money ( Total earnings) , Halls of Fame and rankings; If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score? Vince Lombardi Quote
tnhiker44 Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 who is the best pro bass fisherman in the US? Probably some two year old kid that tags along with Dad (see Tiger Woods). If the many years I have lived have taught me anything, it is... if you think you have seen everything, just wait, you ain't seen nothing yet (BTO). It really depends on how you define best. If you define 'best' by the ability to catch fish on all kinds of water in all different kinds of conditions then I would guess that guy would come from the second tier of pro bass fishermen. Some one who has not quite broke on to the scene yet. The best pro is a hungry pro. Because of this hunger factor, I would pick an older fisherman, like Clunn, Nixon, Martin and the like. But if you define 'best' with records and stats, well, the stats are out there for interpretation. Some people define best by the size of the fan base. KVD draws more attention from a 14th place finish than any other pro finishing second. Quote
alwayslooking Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 I think you have to figure in all the rule changes from past to present. It has been said that Dance and Martin used to hire all the guides on a lake for info before tournys. Each generation of anglers has their own set of rules, such as size limit and creel limits. By todays standard, it's KVD Quote
Super User Muddy Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 PROFESSIONAL SPROTS=STATS there only can be one Most of There can only be one all time money winner there can only be one winner the reporters and the fans talk the :"intangibles" the sponsors, Halls of Fame, Agents and owners all talk stats , because pure stats don't lie there only can be one best of Vince Lombardi had it right: Reporters asking about wining and loosing, all that "it's how you play the game horse %!#*! he looked at em and said If it doesn't matter who wins or looses, then why do we keep score so much for intangible Quote
Super User SirSnookalot Posted August 27, 2009 Super User Posted August 27, 2009 Muddy, as in any sport it's the number of wins against top competition, not money won. Year by year prize funds keep increasing, if Jack Nicklaus had won his tournaments today a good bet his total earnings would surpass Tiger Woods. As it stands he is way down on the money list, but maybe the best ever to play. Quote
looking4structure Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 I would have to say KVD or Bill Dance.My favorites though are Hank Parker and Mr. Roland Martin. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.