Tanker4lyfe Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 This is for real guys!!!! http://www.bloodydecks.com/forums/bass-club/150107-news-flash-world-record-largemouth-contender.html Quote
bigtimfish Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 what is the record as of now? Or what was the record? Quote
Tanker4lyfe Posted July 2, 2009 Author Posted July 2, 2009 george perry's 22.4 lb caught june 2 1932. Quote
Super User Raul Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 what is the record as of now? Or what was the record? 22 lbs 4 oz. Quote
Super User J Francho Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 I just PM'd roadwarrior about this.... But there is a IGFA rule that may affect the outcome: WEIGHTS NEEDED TO DEFEAT OR TIE EXISTING RECORDS 1. To replace a record for a fish weighing less than 25 pounds (11.33 kg), the replacement must weigh at least 2 ounces (56.69 gm) more than the existing record. This will surely have some drama, LOL. Awesome fish!!!! Congrats to the man that caught it. Quote
Tanker4lyfe Posted July 2, 2009 Author Posted July 2, 2009 wow this could get interesting i knew this was coming Quote
etommy28 Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 it would be considered a tie and both names would go on the record. that is if every thing was done write with the weighing and what not. Quote
Super User WRB Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 This fish looks legit to me and calculates out close to the reported weight, based on the photo. This catch, if submitted to the IGFA, will be closely looked at. How it was caught, witnesses, all the validation needs to be right. The fish needs to be examined. It looks like this angler was prepared to take photos with measurements, however no photo of the scale was included. Time will tell the tale. Quote
bassman31783 Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 No matter the outcome, congrats to the angler. Awesome fish. Now, let the debates begin. Quote
Super User Raul Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 I just PM'd roadwarrior about this.... But there is a IGFA rule that may affect the outcome: WEIGHTS NEEDED TO DEFEAT OR TIE EXISTING RECORDS 1. To replace a record for a fish weighing less than 25 pounds (11.33 kg), the replacement must weigh at least 2 ounces (56.69 gm) more than the existing record. This will surely have some drama, LOL. Awesome fish!!!! Congrats to the man that caught it. I was thinking exactly the same, it 's missing an ounce to be the new WR. Man what a bummer ! Quote
mike304 Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 Wow awesome fish! I guess I wasn't aware that Japan had lakes capable of producing a world record fish. As much as I congratulate the fisherman, I wouldn't want to be him. This is going to be the most scrutinized catch in the history of fishing. Quote
Super User flechero Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 Just my own opinion, the 2 ounce rules bites. Bigger is bigger. If a scale is certified, it should be considered accurate and an ounce bigger is bigger. Just another in a LONG list of reasons that the IGFA sucks. Their greatest claim to fame is that the manage to create controversy at nearly every turn. My only question about the fish is, in Japan- you'd think someone had a decent camera. :-? Why are there never good pictures of things like this?? The guy has a $200+ reel and a $20 camera. Hope is scale was more expensive. ;D I was never a skeptic, until I moved in here. Quote
Super User Raul Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 My only question about the fish is, in Japan- you'd think someone had a decent camera. :-? Why are there never good pictures of things like this?? The guy has a $200+ reel and a $20 camera. That would be me , my camera is cheap, most of the times I don 't even carry it and my scale, it 's cheaper than my camera and like the camera, most of the times I don 't carry it. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 I'd like to see the girth and length measurements compared to Perry's. That way we can finally end the debate over whether Perry's was legit or not. Quote
tritz18 Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 Basszilla attacks Tokyo! haha, does anyone know what he caught it on Quote
Tanker4lyfe Posted July 2, 2009 Author Posted July 2, 2009 it measured 29.4 in legth unsure on girth. perrys measured 32.5 and its girth was 28.5 Quote
Super User 5bass Posted July 2, 2009 Super User Posted July 2, 2009 I agree with Keith. 1 oz bigger is 1 oz bigger. Plus, this is bass fishing not ping pong, you shouldnt have to win by 2. That is a HAWG!! Quote
bass wrangler569 Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 That's definitely a pig, and I'm with flechero and FBL, the 2oz rule is ridiculous, bigger is bigger. By the way LOL, has any one else noticed that none of the california boys seem to have any input on this... they must be at home wallowing in defeat ;D Quote
TrippyJai Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 For the people question the picture quality, it is probably from his phone camera. Quote
Lucky Craft Man Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 That's definitely a pig, and I'm with flechero and FBL, the 2oz rule is ridiculous, bigger is bigger. By the way LOL, has any one else noticed that none of the california boys seem to have any input on this... they must be at home wallowing in defeat ;D They are out trying to bring the record back to the US (which I would love to see them do). I always thought if the largemouth bass record was broken in another country, it would be in Mexico. I never would have dreamed it would be Japan (especially since I heard they wanted to erradicate all their waters of "non-native" species, such as the LM Bass) Quote
-HAWK- Posted July 2, 2009 Posted July 2, 2009 That fish is insane!! Unbelievable that this fish came from Japan. I really thought California would be the one to break the record. Are Japanese Largemouth some sort of hybrid, or pure Florida Strain?? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.