Woodsman Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 Due to the evidence that trout are ingesting and not passing soft plastic baits, it seems likely that the State of Maine, may in the near future, attempt to pass legislation banning soft plastics. Does anyone have any idea if plastic bait companies are moving toward biodegradible baits? It would be awful to lose plastics as we have today without having something to replace it. On the other hand, if trout are indeed being harmed then something should be done. Looking for feedback and opinions. This is not going to be easy. Quote
George Welcome Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 Two companies that I know of: Pure Fishing and Yamamoto. Quote
Super User Wayne P. Posted August 3, 2008 Super User Posted August 3, 2008 A hook may harm a trout too. Are those going to be banned too? BS Quote
CRFisher Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 Just think of the number of senkos that have fallen or ripped off hooks the last few years alone. I believe whatever chemical makes the plastic "soft" may potentially leach out of the bait, I think this is why there are "worm proof" tackle binders. I believe Europe banned it in all kids toys, I wouldn't be surprised to see it banned for fishing soon too. Quote
avid Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 So live bait is bad because the fish swallow the hooks. And plastic artificial's are bad because trout can't poop. Lead sinkers are bad because it pollutes the water. I say we just ban all fishing and be done with it. Quote
CRFisher Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 Tungsten ($$$) steel, tin or brass weights with Gulp or similar types should be OK. My guess is that once a state bans it (a big if) you'll see a gigantic amount of biodegradable types of "plastics" come out. Maybe they'll go back to being "rubber" worms. Quote
Super User Crestliner2008 Posted August 3, 2008 Super User Posted August 3, 2008 So live bait is bad because the fish swallow the hooks.And plastic artificial's are bad because trout can't poop. Lead sinkers are bad because it pollutes the water. I say we just ban all fishing and be done with it. I think you pretty well hit the nail on the head! Can't do this....can't do that.....just plain can't!! Quote
Super User Dan: Posted August 3, 2008 Super User Posted August 3, 2008 Berkley too. Gulp is biodegradable. Berkley is owned by Pure fishing. Avid says it all, all we can do is the best we can to avoid harming the fish. No fisherman wants to hurt the species they fish for... Quote
Super User burleytog Posted August 3, 2008 Super User Posted August 3, 2008 So live bait is bad because the fish swallow the hooks.And plastic artificial's are bad because trout can't poop. Lead sinkers are bad because it pollutes the water. I say we just ban all fishing and be done with it. Didn't you get the memo? That's the plan. :-X Quote
Titleman Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 _ B_u_r_l_e_y You may be more right than you think. BTW, really like your signature. 8-), Tom Quote
bass wrangler569 Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 That surprises me coming out of Maine. When I read ban on soft plastics California immediately came to mind (they seem to enjoy banning things). I bet California will jump on the on the ban-soft plastics boat soon though. They'll probably discover that wild condors are eating the trout and are dying as a result and we just can't have that. Quote
Max-in-Mn Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 That surprises me coming out of Maine. When I read ban on soft plastics California immediately came to mind (they seem to enjoy banning things). I bet California will jump on the on the ban-soft plastics boat soon though. They'll probably discover that wild condors are eating the trout and are dying as a result and we just can't have that. Well said ;D Quote
Super User Marty Posted August 3, 2008 Super User Posted August 3, 2008 I'd be interested in reading the story. Does anyone have a link? Quote
mayassa Posted August 3, 2008 Posted August 3, 2008 I guess you should stock up, before the ban. Quote
Woodsman Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 I don't think you can access it via the web. The article is in this months Maine Sportsman magazine. The article was written by the editor who suggest that a ban should be debated. Quote
Super User Sam Posted August 4, 2008 Super User Posted August 4, 2008 I sincerely hope the Main Legislature takes the same amount of interest in all of the freshwater fishing concerns you all have and helps make freshwater fishing better in the entire state. Time will tell. Quote
quant PT Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 A hook may harm a trout too. Are those going to be banned too? BS And bears - ban them too. They eat trout! Quote
Brian_Reeves Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 I say eat all the trout before they eat all of the plastic. That ban may actually make sense in places that aren't heavily dependent on bass populations. Fishing down here in the south revolves around bass, so that ban would be very, very hard to push through. I wouldn't worry about it. If it does go through, use foodsource or GULP baits. I'd rather not fish, personally. Quote
moby bass Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 So live bait is bad because the fish swallow the hooks.And plastic artificial's are bad because trout can't poop. Lead sinkers are bad because it pollutes the water. I say we just ban all fishing and be done with it. Careful! We've already banned cutting certain trees because of the little critters that live in them. Better to protect them than to build a house for a human. : When it happens, it shouldn't come as a surprise. Quote
GonzoFishing Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 The fishing will go on but you can bet that we will have to pony up alot more money replacing all our "old plastic baits" with "the new improved bio version". d**n greedy trout! Quote
-HAWK- Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 Seems like this would be a hard Ban to pass with all the fisherman that fish plastics. :-X Quote
B-o-b Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 Better start practicing sneaking up on bass with my hands and grabbin em Quote
NBR Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 This is likely in response to a Field and Stream article a few months maybe several months back. The research for the article was not well done and in my opinion was full of holes. If the Maine legislature goes forward with this they will prove my theory that state legislators are at the low end of the spectrum in intelectual capacity. Just below their federal counter parts and a bit above toads. I have seen bass with Senko like lures coming out of their vent. Seeing it doesn't mean they expelled it saferly but in doesn't mean they didn't either. Quote
Pencil Pusher Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 There was an article in Field and Stream earlier this year, march or April I think, that had this information about Maine perhaps banning plastic baits. There was also some statements about private areas already banning some soft plastics. But, the biggest concern for plastic baits is not that they specifically will be banned in some areas but that the chemicals used to soften plastic for production may be banned entirely because its use in other soft plastic items such as baby pacifiers, teething rings, etc. is harmful. If the chemicals are banned, it won't matter how many fishermen use soft plastics, they won't be available until someone comes up with different softening chemicals. Remember, lead shot got banned and every shotgun hunter in the world was using lead shot. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.