justfishin Posted December 11, 2006 Posted December 11, 2006 If you are coming to Maryland and fishing the Lower Potomoc, Washington DC area please read this article on Snakeheads. This is a unwelcome problem that we have been handed in Maryland. www.dnr.state.md.us/dnrnews/infocus/snakehead.asp Quote
Super User SPEEDBEAD. Posted December 11, 2006 Super User Posted December 11, 2006 One of the ponds probably overflowed and dumped them....pity. Quote
Bionic Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Snakeheads have been misreported by the media and misunderstood by just about everyone. They have been down here in Florida for years and nobody seemed to notice. They aren't the killing machines that the media has made them out to be. I have fished for them here, Thailand and Malaysia. They are one of my favorite sport fish. There are also a lot of different species. One of which was introduced in Hawaii on purpose. They are a much better game fish then bass and are very good to eat. The species that you have up there, Channa Argus, know as the Northern Snakehead are somewhat shy and not as aggressive. The Bulls-eye Snakehead we have down here falls into the same category, where as the Giant Snakehead, known here as the Red Snakehead is much more aggressive and would be the most potentially destructive species. I think instead of just killing them you might want to take them home and enjoy a good tasting fish dinner. Don't fear just enjoy another strong fight fish. Scott P.S. There were Snakehead farms here in the US before the wide spread panic, just no one cared until it was the popular thing to do. Quote
pickerelpiney Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 they look like fun to catch. hope they "invade" some of my lakes. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted December 12, 2006 Super User Posted December 12, 2006 The issue is not whether or not they are good to catch or what they have done in Florida, it is what they could potentially do to the ecosystems in Maryland and Virginia. There is no way to know what they might do, just like any case when new, foreign species are introduced into new ecosystems. It is therefore dangerous to allow them to establish a population in local waters, no matter how "fun" they are to catch... Quote
Super User SPEEDBEAD. Posted December 12, 2006 Super User Posted December 12, 2006 Brown trout are not native to the US...and they are actually quite aggressive. Quote
Valascus Posted December 12, 2006 Posted December 12, 2006 Snakeheads have been misreported by the media and misunderstood by just about everyone. They have been down here in Florida for years and nobody seemed to notice. They aren't the killing machines that the media has made them out to be. I have fished for them here, Thailand and Malaysia. They are one of my favorite sport fish. There are also a lot of different species. One of which was introduced in Hawaii on purpose. They are a much better game fish then bass and are very good to eat. The species that you have up there, Channa Argus, know as the Northern Snakehead are somewhat shy and not as aggressive. The Bulls-eye Snakehead we have down here falls into the same category, where as the Giant Snakehead, known here as the Red Snakehead is much more aggressive and would be the most potentially destructive species. I think instead of just killing them you might want to take them home and enjoy a good tasting fish dinner. Don't fear just enjoy another strong fight fish. Scott P.S. There were Snakehead farms here in the US before the wide spread panic, just no one cared until it was the popular thing to do. I think I am inclined to respectfully disagree with you here. Here is a link discussing the features of each snakehead species and the possible ecological impact they could have. http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/snakehead/overview.php I am not aware of how the aquatic food chain works in Maryland, so I am not aware of what the greatest aquatic predator in Maryland may be. I do know in Florida snakeheads would not be at the top of the aquatic foodchain. That belongs to the gators down there which can help control a snakehead population down there. There are also a huge variety of birds that feed heavily on fish in florida that could aslo help control a snakehead population. In Maryland their are no such predators that can effectively prey upon snakehead which will lead to the displacement of native fish species as well as increased competition for prey for native fish species. Snakeheads reproduce quickly laying as many as 100,000 eggs at a time. I am sure snakehead fry could fall prey to native predatory fish such as bass and the pike family of fish. The fact is that the ecosystem as it is today is self sustaining with the correct balance of predatory and prey fish. Add another large predatory fish with few natural enemies, can reproduce quickly, and puts a extra strain upon the prey base that spells disaster for a sustained ecosystem. Quote
Bionic Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 quote author[=Bionic link=1165842041/0#2 date=1165881837]. I think I am inclined to respectfully disagree with you here. Here is a link discussing the features of each snakehead species and the possible ecological impact they could have. http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/snakehead/overview.php I am not aware of how the aquatic food chain works in Maryland, so I am not aware of what the greatest aquatic predator in Maryland may be. I do know in Florida snakeheads would not be at the top of the aquatic foodchain. That belongs to the gators down there which can help control a snakehead population down there. There are also a huge variety of birds that feed heavily on fish in florida that could aslo help control a snakehead population. In Maryland their are no such predators that can effectively prey upon snakehead which will lead to the displacement of native fish species as well as increased competition for prey for native fish species. Snakeheads reproduce quickly laying as many as 100,000 eggs at a time. I am sure snakehead fry could fall prey to native predatory fish such as bass and the pike family of fish. The fact is that the ecosystem as it is today is self sustaining with the correct balance of predatory and prey fish. Add another large predatory fish with few natural enemies, can reproduce quickly, and puts a extra strain upon the prey base that spells disaster for a sustained ecosystem. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted December 13, 2006 Super User Posted December 13, 2006 They aren't killing the snakeheads for no reasons, they are killing them in an attempt to keep them from spreading into other ecosystems and potentially killing thousands and thousands of other species. Whether or not that will happen we don't know, but I would rather not take the chance. I know a lot of the efforts taken in the Maryland/Virginia areas where they have been found has helped the problem from spreading. Also, as for the peacock bass comparison. It is my understanding that peacock bass need a very specific climate for survival and therefore can only survive in certain parts of Florida. It is different with the snakehead because they are not that climate sensitive and can therefore spread into and threaten more ecosystems. Quote
Bionic Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 They aren't killing the snakeheads for no reasons, they are killing them in an attempt to keep them from spreading into other ecosystems and potentially killing thousands and thousands of other species. Whether or not that will happen we don't know, but I would rather not take the chance. I know a lot of the efforts taken in the Maryland/Virginia areas where they have been found has helped the problem from spreading. Also, as for the peacock bass comparison. It is my understanding that peacock bass need a very specific climate for survival and therefore can only survive in certain parts of Florida. It is different with the snakehead because they are not that climate sensitive and can therefore spread into and threaten more ecosystems. Your are correct. The Snakeheads here are also restricted to the south as they can not survive cold water, where as the ones you have can. I would just prefer to see them on a diner plate then a garbage can. Maybe donate them to food kitchens. Like I see make something positive out of it. Scott P.S. Evolution and change are inevitable I am on the side of, if life hands you lemons you just make lemonade Quote
Fishin Phil Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 I used to have a red snakehead in a 50 gallon tank. Â He got pretty big then died. Â My buddy had a northern snakehead and the thing used to jump out of his tank. Â They claim they can walk all over land, but my buddies was not out of the tank more then 2 hours and it was seriously messed up. Â It died the next morning. Â :-[ Â I know they can breath air, but they will dry out like any other fish. Quote
Floridabassking352 Posted December 24, 2006 Posted December 24, 2006 I would much rather catch a bass than a snakehead. I don't see a future business in guide fishing for snakeheads. Who would want to catch one? They are ugly and pesky, just like the stupid bowfin that always eat my bass lures. Quote
Super User ww2farmer Posted December 25, 2006 Super User Posted December 25, 2006 Who is to say if snakeheads will damage/wipe out other fish populations or not. I for one would not bet on it either way...........BUT that beeing said, many MANY waters home to Largemouth bass are not in it's native range either........how many people think thats a bad thing?? Quote
bass109 Posted December 25, 2006 Posted December 25, 2006 I really dont think that snakehead will ever harm the bass population. Largemouth bass are the top predator freshwater fish in the States. I never seen another fish eat a bass. Catfish dont even eat largemouth bass, and they eat all kinds of stuff. Northern pike/muskie are very similar to Snakehead. Snakehead as much a threat to bass and as pike/muskie. Quote
FuzzyMonkey Posted December 25, 2006 Posted December 25, 2006 its interesting this whole native vs non native debate goes to show that the funding available to those that convince us the sky is falling as a note no fish are native in a man made lake Quote
Bionic Posted December 25, 2006 Posted December 25, 2006 I would much rather catch a bass than a snakehead. I don't see a future business in guide fishing for snakeheads. Who would want to catch one? They are ugly and pesky, just like the stupid bowfin that always eat my bass lures. I would be willing to bet you are all excited when the bowfin hits and is pulling hard and only get upset when you see it's a bowfin. It amazes me. To me I enjoy any fish that I catch, there is no garbage fish. I also think it's funny when I see people whoot and holler when they hook a fish thinking man I got a big one for it to turn out to be a "trash" fish. Most "trash" fish are better fighters than the "game" fish that their fishing for. Also for the question of who would want to catch a snakehead over a bass, pick me. Next time you're out fishing do it with an open mind and just enjoy the fight. Don't hate just appreciate. Quote
Super User ww2farmer Posted December 25, 2006 Super User Posted December 25, 2006 . To me I enjoy any fish that I catch, there is no garbage fish. I also think it's funny when I see people whoot and holler when they hook a fish thinking man I got a big one for it to turn out to be a "trash" fish. Most "trash" fish are better fighters than the "game" fish that their fishing for. . LOL AMEN..........although I fish for bass almost exclusivly, it always brings a smile to my face to catch something by "accident" be it pike (some days more pike than bass on "accident"), carp, crappie, bullhead, or whatever............when I lived in florida I was always dissapointed when I caught a gar by accident and couldn't land it, I wanted to see one of those bad boys up close, but I could never get one in with out beeing bit off or the hook was just not set in that rock hard bone of a mouth. Usually one of my best fishing periods of the year up here is when the bass have finished spawning I will go after bullhead for a while, they bite anything and are a blast when the bass seem unwilling to play. Quote
Super User Munkin Posted December 25, 2006 Super User Posted December 25, 2006 I never seen another fish eat a bass. I have seen tiger muskee's bite hooked bass almost in half! Allen Quote
Super User SPEEDBEAD. Posted December 26, 2006 Super User Posted December 26, 2006 I really dont think that snakehead will ever harm the bass population. Largemouth bass are the top predator freshwater fish in the States. I never seen another fish eat a bass. Catfish dont even eat bass, and they eat all kinds of stuff. Northern pike/muskie are very similar to Snakehead. Snakehead as much a threat to bass and as pike/muskie. Ok, this is incorrect. Largemouth bass may be the most recognizable predator, but they are by no means the TOP predator. Put a 5lb bass in front of a 100lb blue cat or 50lb flathead cat and see what happens. Look how many smallmouth bass in the north have teeth marks on them from musky and pike taking shots at them. I totally disagree with your post. Wayne Quote
Bionic Posted December 26, 2006 Posted December 26, 2006 I have seen just about every species eat one of their own. Must predators will eat any fish that is small enough to fit in their mouth. I have seen pike try and eat other pike that were too big and choked to death on them. It all goes back to beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If you like the non native it's alright and if you don't they all should be kill. Peacock bass - yeaaaa Snakehead - booooo One was hyped as good ( peacocks ) and one was hyped as bad ( snakeheads ) both are non native and both compete with largemouth bass, so why give one the thumbs up and the other the thumbs down? Both are better fighters and the snakehead is better to eat than the LM bass, so is it really about native species or which had better marketing? To me if you ban one you have to ban them all and that's not going to happen, so just go out, fish and be happy that you caught something. Scott P.S. Life is too short to worry about this issue. Quote
bass109 Posted December 27, 2006 Posted December 27, 2006 Look how many smallmouth bass in the north have teeth marks on them from musky and pike taking shots at them. Â not eating smallmouth bass, largemouth bass are the bass that never had been eaten by a pike or musky. Quote
Super User SPEEDBEAD. Posted December 27, 2006 Super User Posted December 27, 2006 Dude, you are wrong. Bottom line. I tried to be nice about this but.... I dont know that there is a person on here that will agree with your "assumption" that a pike or musky is somehow lower on the food chain than a largemouth. It is simple nature. BIG FISH EAT SMALLER FISH. The fact of the matter is that pike and musky are bigger fish. Granted, a largemouth will eat a small pike or musky. I will give you that. But looking at the two species, with adult examples of each, it is simply incorrect to think that the largemouth is the more dominant predator. Wayne Quote
Syfer420 Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 umm heres a video of a pike eating a bass....... granted its a smallmouth http://www.fishfever.com/node/25 Quote
bass109 Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 I will give you that. But looking at the two species, with adult examples of each, it is simply incorrect to think that the largemouth is the more dominant predator. I do see your point but Is there any record of any species that ate a largemouth bass before? Quote
Super User SPEEDBEAD. Posted December 29, 2006 Super User Posted December 29, 2006 For you to think that nothing will eat LMB EVER is ridiculous. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.