Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Sources: At least 21 Bama wins at stake

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ESPN.com news services

The NCAA will reveal later Thursday that the Alabama football program must vacate victories from 2005 through 2007 that included players who improperly got free textbooks for other students, the Birmingham News is reporting.

Alabama could be forced to vacate as many as 21 wins under the watch of former coach Mike Shula and current coach Nick Saban, sources at the university told ESPN.com's Mark Schlabach. Citing a source, the News reported the number of wins to be at least 10.

The Crimson Tide will not lose future scholarships, according to the News. The university also will be placed on three years' probation and ordered to pay a fine, the newspaper reported.

The NCAA alleges the violations began at the start of the 2005 season; the university reported the violations after uncovering them during the '07 football season, when starting linemen Antoine Caldwell and Marlon Davis, running back Glen Coffee and defensive backs Chris Rogers and Marquis Johnson were suspended prior to kickoff against Tennessee.

They were suspended for four games and reinstated by the NCAA before the Alabama-Auburn game and the Crimson Tide's bowl game against Colorado at the end of the season.

Under NCAA rules, the players would be ruled ineligible from when they first received the "extra benefits" and would have been ineligible until they were suspended and reinstated.

The university appeared before the NCAA Committee on Infractions in February and admitted that infractions occurred in several sports, and that it didn't adequately monitor its distribution of textbooks to athletes.

It is not clear which additional sports programs at Alabama are affected. The NCAA's ruling will be announced at 3 p.m. ET Thursday.

Posted
How 'bout the "Death Penalty"

My thoughts exactly... I wonder if the same repeated infractions by a school with less of a tradition would result in a harsher penalty  ::)

  • Super User
Posted
The SEC has to cheat to win.... SUPRISE!!!!

While I loathe Alabama, this is hardly an infraction that would result in them winning any games.

Posted
The SEC has to cheat to win.... SUPRISE!!!!

While I loathe Alabama, this is hardly an infraction that would result in them winning any games.

I just like to run my mouth. You should know by now Burleyman.

:)

  • Super User
Posted

What is funny about this situation is that it revolves around textbooks.

As if the football players need textbooks.  ;D

  • Super User
Posted

They cannnot lose games because bunch players gave textbook to students.

Come on, they was just doing charitable work to their fellow students who wasn't on scholarship. It not like they pulled Florida State. ::) Some people just hate Alabama and will not grow up.

Whoever said SEC has to cheat to win. There no cheating involved here, they just gave a textbook to a student who wasn't on scholarship. This kind of thing is highly unrelated to the football field.

Posted
They cannnot lose games because bunch players gave textbook to students.

Come on, they was just doing charitable work to their fellow students who wasn't on scholarship. It not like they pulled Florida State. ::) Some people just hate Alabama and will not grow up.

Whoever said SEC has to cheat to win. There no cheating involved here, they just gave a textbook to a student who wasn't on scholarship. This kind of thing is highly unrelated to the football field.

Playing with any player that shouldn't be eligible to play is called cheating.

  • Super User
Posted
They cannnot lose games because bunch players gave textbook to students.

Come on, they was just doing charitable work to their fellow students who wasn't on scholarship. It not like they pulled Florida State. ::) Some people just hate Alabama and will not grow up.

Whoever said SEC has to cheat to win. There no cheating involved here, they just gave a textbook to a student who wasn't on scholarship. This kind of thing is highly unrelated to the football field.

Playing with any player that shouldn't be eligible to play is called cheating.

When Alabama first discovered this, several players were suspended for 4 games. (pretty much the remainder of the season)

This kind of infraction has nothing to do with their grades, therefore, doesn't effect the eligibility of their status to play on the gridiron.

Oh well, I'll just sit back and watch Alabama football move on when season start September 5th. Anyone know what a Hokie is? :-?

Posted

It does affect their eligibility. When you take thousands of dollars from your University while you are on scholarship you will be suspended. These guys took got free books from their scholarship money and SOLD them to other students.

Back to my point, if you have football players that were breaking laws or school rules contributing to wins, (i.e. entering a game at all) that is cheating. It is cheating when you use players to win that should have never been on the field on the first place because of their wrong doings.

People are saying on here "Oh, that was nice of them to give out text books." They don't understand that there are thousands of other students not on full scholarship that pay the full price for text books. So here we have football players being given at least $10,000 a year to play football in college, when most of them came from wealthy backgrounds in the first place, and they sell textbooks they got for free. That's not right, and they don't deserve to step a foot on a football field.

  • Super User
Posted
It does affect their eligibility. When you take thousands of dollars from your University while you are on scholarship you will be suspended. These guys took got free books from their scholarship money and SOLD them to other students.

Until you can prove they "SOLD" the books I'm continue to say they gave it out as charity.

Yet on Thursday, the NCAA Committee on Infractions imposed no scholarship reductions on the Crimson Tide football team or any of the university's other 15 teams that had 201 players obtain free textbooks for their buddies.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=maisel_ivan&id=4252254

I'm looking forward for the team to move on. Saban should have them mentally focus on the task at hand rather than all this negativeness.

P.S. If you look at some of Alabama players roster, some of the town they are from are not exactly "wealthy". Some of 'em came from dirt poor neighbor and the scholarship was their only way out. The argument "they came from rich neighborhood they do not need scholarship" is a very old and tiring argument.

Posted

Bottom line: When you play with ineligible players it is called cheating. You cannot argue that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.