Tokyo Tony Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Have you guys seen this? http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/dec/02/wounded-deer-attacks-hunter-who-shot-him/ Don't read the blog at the bottom unless you want to be p'd off Quote
Siebert Outdoors Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Interesting read. I read all the other stuff too. Its interesting to say the least. Quote
slomoe Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Don't read the blog at the bottom unless you want to be p'd off what this? simple_jack writes: Dis story makes me skary. I mabe see it in my night movies and it makes my eyes rain. Pleez Bamby dont hert de man eny moor. ;D ;D Quote
Super User flechero Posted December 3, 2008 Super User Posted December 3, 2008 two well-placed shots with his .270-caliber If the shots were well placed, one would have done it. The deer ran a short distance and went down, and died after Goodman fired two more shots. I sure wasn't there but anyone needing 4 shots with a .270 to kill a whitetail, may be not telling the whole story.... Quote
Super User roadwarrior Posted December 3, 2008 Super User Posted December 3, 2008 I sure wasn't there but anyone needing 4 shots with a .270 to kill a whitetail, may be not telling the whole story.... Well, anyone that has ever hunted with a .270 would know exactly that what you're saying is more than just "an opinion". : Quote
aceman387 Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 that was one angry deer, he must have been on steriods Quote
Super User flechero Posted December 3, 2008 Super User Posted December 3, 2008 In the spirit of full disclosure, I once fired a second shot into an antelope... I thought he was "out on his feet" but realized after the 2nd shot that he literally hung in the fence and couldn't fall over. ;D Quote
Mobydick Posted December 3, 2008 Posted December 3, 2008 Thats a neat mount flechero! I don't think he's telling the whole story. A .270 is not a very powerfull gun, but 2 well placed shots should have put it down. Quote
BassResource.com Advertiser FD. Posted December 4, 2008 BassResource.com Advertiser Posted December 4, 2008 It's been awhile since I hunted much but I do remember a few things. a) My uncle hunted with a 270 and I prefer the 30-30. 2) The 270 bullet weighs about half that of the 30-30 but has a much higher muzzle velocity. and C) The last deer I shot, he spun around and dropped on the spot but the bullet did not exit. The last deer I saw that had been shot with a 270 had a tiny entrance wound and a missing shoulder on the exit side. I would be interested to know just how much meat would be left after 4 270 rounds went through. Quote
Super User burleytog Posted December 4, 2008 Super User Posted December 4, 2008 I would be interested to know just how much meat would be left after 4 270 rounds went through. Depends on shot placement and bullet construction. Quote
IDbasser Posted December 4, 2008 Posted December 4, 2008 My .270 does just fine on our mule deer, and I know several people who do just fine shooting elk with .270's. It is not the gun, but the shooter. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.