tnhiker44 Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 I find it interesting how if a species is desirable (largemouth) 'we' do not seem to care that it is non-native to our area, or what impact it might have had on the fishery. The snakeheads show up and we are collectively out to kill every last one of 'em. We really are selfish creatures that are in way over our heads. Quote
gar-tracker Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 A good visual example would be to look at the hyacinth clogged waters of Florida lakes, along with hydrilla both are exotics and provide a good example of what happens when a species, plant or animal, are introduced to any ecosystem that provides a similar environment. We spend millions trying to curtail the unwanted vegetation. Always look at the long term effect. The freeze did what nature wanted, cleaned a little house. Quote
0119 Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 There is nothing politically correct nor environmentally sound about my feelings on the subject. South Florida at least on the west side has been dessimated more by the influx of people than by the influx of exotics. Tilapia have totally pushed out the bluegill/shellcrackers here. The Mayans have now come in and for me are a fishery all in their own. They grow to about 3lbs and fight better than bass. When tilapia and Mayans are juvenile they fatten up the landlocked Snook nicely. Florida will survive the exotics but it wont survive the influx of northern'ers moving in and consuming/polluting the little water we have left. Quote
Tpayneful Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Dan, Cold scale: 1 = Coldest 114 = Warmest December 2009 http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=nationalℑ=Statewidetrank&year=2009&month=12&ext=gif Virginia 38th Coldest December 2008 http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/2008/dec/12Statewidetrank_pg.gif Virginia 94th Coldest It seems like it is colder in my part of the country this year as opposed to last year. Quote
Super User Grey Wolf Posted January 22, 2010 Super User Posted January 22, 2010 There is nothing politically correct nor environmentally sound about my feelings on the subject. South Florida at least on the west side has been dessimated more by the influx of people than by the influx of exotics. Tilapia have totally pushed out the bluegill/shellcrackers here. The Mayans have now come in and for me are a fishery all in their own. They grow to about 3lbs and fight better than bass. When tilapia and Mayans are juvenile they fatten up the landlocked Snook nicely. Florida will survive the exotics but it wont survive the influx of northern'ers moving in and consuming/polluting the little water we have left. d**n for a minute there I thought you were going to say cubans. Quote
Southflangler Posted January 24, 2010 Posted January 24, 2010 The point is that some fish may be non-native but not be invasive. The fish that are here and are non-native may not have a big impact on native species i.e. grass carp. The Mayan cichlids and peacocks and tilapia have an impact on the native wildlife being invasive. Invasive fish out compete native fish for food, reproduce faster, and have larger amounts of offspring. Quote
Super User Dan: Posted January 24, 2010 Super User Posted January 24, 2010 The point is that some fish may be non-native but not be invasive. The fish that are here and are non-native may not have a big impact on native species i.e. grass carp. The Mayan cichlids and peacocks and tilapia have an impact on the native wildlife being invasive. Invasive fish out compete native fish for food, reproduce faster, and have larger amounts of offspring. But new species don't even have to do things that significant to change or damage an ecosystem. To use your example, grass carp can actually affect very minute aspects of a body of water that can result in major changes to the whole ecosystem. Anytime you introduce ANYTHING into an ecosystem (plants, animals, bugs, etc...) there is a chance that they might affect some small, unforeseen piece of the ecosystem that can domino into larger problems. It's the law of unintended consequences. Quote
Southflangler Posted January 25, 2010 Posted January 25, 2010 Sure. The grass that the carp eat is invasive. It's a compounding problem. Quote
Super User South FLA Posted January 25, 2010 Super User Posted January 25, 2010 The point is that some fish may be non-native but not be invasive. The fish that are here and are non-native may not have a big impact on native species i.e. grass carp. The Mayan cichlids and peacocks and tilapia have an impact on the native wildlife being invasive. Invasive fish out compete native fish for food, reproduce faster, and have larger amounts of offspring. Bingo!!!!! Peacock bass would have never been introduced if it were for the "invasive" problem (mayans, tilipia, etc). Therefore, I would have to agree that ideally all invasive and non invasive exotic species do more long-term harm to the local ecosystem than good. Sure the Peacock bass fights harder and I would rather catch one over a largemouth, BUT so does a Nile Perch! If those of you who state you don't see a problem with exotics due to X reason (fight, economic impact, etc.) Why not introduce a better fighting species into your local waters that has a better economic impact (i.e. Introducing Nile Perch into brackish and fresh waters of Florida for its sporting and economic impact). This would be the extension of the logic correct? Nevertheless, I am happy we have Peacocks and Oscars around or should I say had....they fight great, but in the back of my mind I will always think that someway these exotics are limiting my ability to catch the 15lb. monster largemouth since exotics have a a direct impact on total biomass a body of water can support. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.