Crankhead Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I've got a Cabelas Grip & Weigh that I use to weigh the bass I catch. But I don't think it's all that accurate. I've been looking at Rapala & Berkley digital scales. I've looked at Cabelas and they have the digital scales priced from $29 & up. I'd like to hear suggestions as to what others have bought & used. Quote
Super User Jig Man Posted March 13, 2008 Super User Posted March 13, 2008 I tried several different ones and couldn't get consistent readings from any of them so I gave up on digital and bought the Boga Grip. Quote
Fishing Doug Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I highly recommend XTOOLS X 2 accurate and easy to use. Quote
Josey Wales Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 We bought a rapala digital scale, and didnt like it at all. The fish had to be perfectly still all the time and it always seemed the fish were smaller then we thought (this is a common fisherman problem) So we bought a digital scale from a supermarket meat dept, and found that the rapala scale was almost always a pound off. Ive yet to buy another one for that reason. I have considered the grip and weigh style that Roland Martin uses, but then again he also endorsed the helicopter lure. *sigh* Quote
twors Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I watched Roland endrose a Boga Grip on one of his shows and he had a Berkley lip grip in his hand...LOL! I'd probably buy the X-Tool scale myself if I had the need for a new scale. The Boga grips sure are pretty but they only weigh in 1/4 pound increments. With that kind of resolution, my cheap 15 dollar lipper I bought at BPS does the same job. Quote
arthurspooner13 Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I haven't had too much trouble with my Berkley. I'm the type of guy who won't even weigh a bass unless it's pushing 4 lbs... and i live in Michigan. Quote
VA BassHound Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I have owned 2 different Berkley digital scales, and they were both junk. I would weigh the same 5lb weight on different days and get a different reading each day, none of which were ever 5lbs. A more accurate way of depicting the size of fish is measure the length and girth with a tape measure. I try not to get caught up on the weight of fish. When someone tells me the weight of the fish they caught, I take it with a grain of salt, because unless there digital scales can be calibrated it will always give a unreliable reading. Quote
Super User Marty Posted March 13, 2008 Super User Posted March 13, 2008 When someone tells me the weight of the fish they caught, I take it with a grain of salt, because unless there digital scales can be calibrated it will always give a unreliable reading. I have to disagree. Digital scales can be very accurate and they can also be junk. I've had both. I've also had accurate ones that went bad. Numerous times during every season I test my scales by weighing things that have already been weighed on a certified scale. So I feel confident in the weights and don't accept that they always give unreliable readings. Quote
Super User .dsaavedra. Posted March 14, 2008 Super User Posted March 14, 2008 i had a rapala 15 lb digital scale and that thing was a POS. no matter what the weight was that i weighed, it was always a half pound off. so then i got a 50lb berkley digital scale for xmas, and it is dead on. i bought a bag of trailmix once and it had 1lb 12oz net wt. printed on the package, and when i weighed it on my berkley, it gave me exactly 1lb 12 oz thats pretty good for a $20 digital scale if you ask me. Quote
VA BassHound Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 Marty, there is a reason why fish weights on hand held digital scales are not excepted for qualifying fish for state or world records. That reason is that they are unreliable. Quote
JT Bagwell Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 I highly recommend XTOOLS I have this one too. JT Bagwell Quote
Super User Marty Posted March 14, 2008 Super User Posted March 14, 2008 Marty, there is a reason why fish weights on hand held digital scales are not excepted for qualifying fish for state or world records. That reason is that they are unreliable. I wouldn't use them either for records. But perhaps I didn't make my point clearly enough: I don't accept always unreliable. Individual scales can be very accurate and have that accuracy verified by testing and can yield reliable results, even if they aren't accepted for records. If my scale tests accurate against certified scales on Monday-Wednesday-Friday, I think I can rely on its results on Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday. Quote
GitRDoneIke23 Posted March 15, 2008 Posted March 15, 2008 I highly recommend XTOOLS X 2 accurate and easy to use. X3 8-) Quote
SteveF Posted March 15, 2008 Posted March 15, 2008 I will only use the Cul-M-Rite scales, as it can be certified as well. Thanks. Steve Quote
Super User KU_Bassmaster. Posted March 15, 2008 Super User Posted March 15, 2008 I have an XTools too and highly recommend it. I check about every other week during the season. Dead on in the three years I have had. Plus it has some really "fun" features. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.