HopelesslyAddicted Posted August 10, 2008 Posted August 10, 2008 Alright guys need a little help. I went fishing with Tokyo Tony yesterday and used his IMX 6'6 Med/fast. I was thoroughly impressed and it made me want a GLX. The only thing I didn't like about his IMX was the tip. Even though it was rated fast it really seemd a little too floppy for me (with plastics) I guess I'm just used to my legend tournament which is also rated m/fast but I swear its stiffer than that. So this new glx that I'll be buying will be primarily for plastics and perhaps some lighter jigging. I know that all GLX's are fantastic rods but which one is best for what I want? My first instinct is 7'0 ft med or med heavy power with an extra fast tip... Quote
ThomasL Posted August 10, 2008 Posted August 10, 2008 I use a cr722 which is six feet in medium action in glx but then again i don't fish plastic worms over 6" either. Quote
Super User Chris at Tech Posted August 10, 2008 Super User Posted August 10, 2008 Was the IMX noticeably more sensitive than your Legend Tourney? Quote
bronzeback01 Posted August 10, 2008 Posted August 10, 2008 i have a bsr 803 mossyback that i use for plastics and it's the most sensitive rod i own ( i don't own any junk rods) i can't imagine how sensitive the glx version must be . my next rod is going to be a BSR 852 GLX SENKO ROD. Quote
Super User Gone_Phishin Posted August 10, 2008 Super User Posted August 10, 2008 Either the BCR 852 or 853. These rods are super fast, so the medium fishes a bit heavier. Quote
The_Natural Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 Alright guys need a little help. I went fishing with Tokyo Tony yesterday and used his IMX 6'6 Med/fast. I was thoroughly impressed and it made me want a GLX. The only thing I didn't like about his IMX was the tip. Even though it was rated fast it really seemd a little too floppy for me (with plastics) I guess I'm just used to my legend tournament which is also rated m/fast but I swear its stiffer than that. So this new glx that I'll be buying will be primarily for plastics and perhaps some lighter jigging. I know that all GLX's are fantastic rods but which one is best for what I want? My first instinct is 7'0 ft med or med heavy power with an extra fast tip... A Loomis medium is about the equivalent of a Croix medium-light. The 782c IMX is definitely too light for general worming. 783c (6'6" MH) would be better for an all-arounder, or 844c for a dedicated jig and worm rod. The BCR series is definitely the pinnacle of jig and worm rods, but they aren't versatile...they are ultra-fast action rods that are underrated on power. I recommend heading to a retailer that carries loomis so you can play around with a few of the different rods and check out each ones action. Quote
Super User Bassn Blvd Posted August 11, 2008 Super User Posted August 11, 2008 You will notice that Loomis rods seem to be a bit lighter than advertised. Quote
Super User flechero Posted August 11, 2008 Super User Posted August 11, 2008 The only thing I didn't like about his IMX was the tip. Even though it was rated fast it really seemd a little too floppy for me (with plastics) Bad news... the reason that tip is so light is that IMX "fast" is like most other's x-fast. If you want a "heavier" tip, you'll need to find a slower tapered blank. That tip is what so many people rave about as far as being super sensitive and being able to cast lighter baits on a heavier blank. After re-reading your post, was his rod a 782? If so, that's really light and a heavier rod would correct the "problem" you had with it. If you want a Med power in st.croix speak, look to a H in Loomis for a similar feel in power. I had a MBR783C IMX (labeled MH)for all of 2 days. It felt like a light to me. I sold it in short order. I still have a 784 and an 844 IMX. Quote
HopelesslyAddicted Posted August 11, 2008 Author Posted August 11, 2008 Was the IMX noticeably more sensitive than your Legend Tourney? Personally I thought that they were very close sensitivity wise and I wouldn't necessarily pick one over the other. I am however expecting the GLX to be my new favorite rod. Thank you guys for the advice. MBR844C has come highly recommended I have heard, but isn't that a little heavy to fish soft plastics and lighter jigs? I thought you preferred spinning tackle for plastics RW? Quote
Super User roadwarrior Posted August 11, 2008 Super User Posted August 11, 2008 My MBR844C is my dedicated jig rod, but I do fish some big soft plastics with the rod. Specifically, the new Rage Tail 10" Anaconda with a 1/4 oz weight. Otherwise, I fish soft plastics (generally weightless) on a Medium Power/ Fast Action spinning rig: St. Croix Legend Elite ES70MF/ Stella 2500FB/ Yo-Zuri Hybrid #6. The MBR 844C is perfect for medium weight and up (Senko for example). I don't fish unweighted soft plastics on a baitcaster simply because they "occasionally" take flight. The resulting backlash is not worth it to me, even if it's a rare occurance. 8-) Quote
Super User Raul Posted August 11, 2008 Super User Posted August 11, 2008 Alright guys need a little help. I went fishing with Tokyo Tony yesterday and used his IMX 6'6 Med/fast. I was thoroughly impressed and it made me want a GLX. The only thing I didn't like about his IMX was the tip. That 's cuz you were fishing with a Medium power, try a heavier power ( 3 or 4 ) and the mushyness goes away. Quote
HopelesslyAddicted Posted August 11, 2008 Author Posted August 11, 2008 My MBR844C is my dedicated jig rod, but I do fish somebig soft plastics with the rod. Specifically, the new Rage Tail 10" Anaconda with a 1/4 oz weight. Otherwise, I fish soft plastics (generally weightless) on a Medium Power/ Fast Action spinning rig: St. Croix Legend Elite ES70MF/ Stella 2500FB/ Yo-Zuri Hybrid #6. The MBR 844C is perfect for medium weight and up (Senko for example). I don't fish unweighted soft plastics on a baitcaster simply because they "occasionally" take flight. The resulting backlash is not worth it to me, even if it's a rare occurance. 8-) I may actually end up getting the MBR844C for heavier applications like jigging and heavier plastics. I guess I need two GLX's lol What spinning model GLX should fill in for what the MBR can't do well? Quote
shimanogloomis man Posted August 11, 2008 Posted August 11, 2008 I would really look at the glx bcr series if rods. I have a bcr854 that i use for jigs and t rigs. These rods are more sensitive then my lts.. Quote
HopelesslyAddicted Posted August 12, 2008 Author Posted August 12, 2008 I would really look at the glx bcr series if rods. I have a bcr854 that i use for jigs and t rigs. These rods are more sensitive then my lts.. I surely will look at those. And yes I do expect these glxs to be more sensitive than my LT. I could really feel the potential in the imx. But I love my LT too! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.