Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted

The 902c would be 1" longer, the 852c would be 4" shorter - so the 902 would be closer to the 892 in 'feel' - 1st two numbers are the length in inches, 3rd number is the power.

Posted
2 hours ago, freelancer27 said:

Hi all!

My GLX 892c broke today.. 😕

Looking to replace it. A bit of a bummer that they did drop the 892c from the line up. Which would be the natural replacement?

* 852c
* 902c
* 893c

I was throwing anything from a 1/8oz ned rig to a 5inch senko on the 892c. 

Thanks!

I throw that stuff on my GLX 852 JWR. Love it.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, freelancer27 said:

Hi all!

My GLX 892c broke today.. 😕

Looking to replace it. A bit of a bummer that they did drop the 892c from the line up. Which would be the natural replacement?

* 852c
* 902c
* 893c

I was throwing anything from a 1/8oz ned rig to a 5inch senko on the 892c. 

Thanks!

If it’s discontinued, loom is will give you the same rod in the next level up. I broke a discontinued IMX and they sent a GLX

Posted
8 minutes ago, looking45 said:

If it’s discontinued, loom is will give you the same rod in the next level up. I broke a discontinued IMX and they sent a GLX

Well, there is no 892c either in the NRX or Conquest line up. So, it will be a 2024 GLX, I assume.

I am aware of the differences in length. Was just cuirous if anyone had any of the 2024 GLXs that I listed in order to provide an opinion. 

As of right now, the 852c seems like the right pick.

  • Super User
Posted
5 hours ago, freelancer27 said:

Hi all!

My GLX 892c broke today.. 😕

Looking to replace it. A bit of a bummer that they did drop the 892c from the line up. Which would be the natural replacement?

* 852c
* 902c
* 893c

I was throwing anything from a 1/8oz ned rig to a 5inch senko on the 892c. 

Thanks!

How did it break? I have the 892c JWR, 

Posted
2 hours ago, alonerankin2 said:

How did it break? I have the 892c JWR, 

I castes a 1/2oz lipless with quite some power. Should not break the rod (was my 3rd outing with it), so must either got a ding on the blank from me transporting it somehow or already flawed when I got it (in February).

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Received my GLX 902c on Friday and took it out for a spin on Saturday. Wanted to share my early thoughts on the rod to help others in their possible decision making process.

Reminder: My (old) GLX 892c snapped on me (the rod probably did not like that it was foul hooked and casted into the lake some time before it snapped.. ;D), so I used the Xpeditor program to replace it.

[b]First impressions out of the rod tube:
[/b]
* Rod weight 3.73oz, the 892c came in at 4.31oz, which is great deal of weight reduction given the additional length and its full cork handle!!
* Weight reduction would not mean nothing, if balance was off. I am happy to report that the rod balances really well. I am using a Calcutta Conquest Shollow Edition on it and the rod balances perfectly with the reel.

[b]Looks:[/b] well, let's put it this way: the black and gold takes a bit of time to get used to. While the Conquest SE's blue tone perfectly matched the old GLX's color tone, it looks a bit displaced on the new GLX. The golden Conquest would look probably perfect on it though. I am not thaaat particular about my gear, so dont think I will change that any time soon.

[b]Fit and finish:[/b] typical Gloomis. It's okay but no where near a Megabass or even a Steez. We all know that.. The blank has little to no epoxy on it (similar to the NRX, is it the same blank?) which I would think is a main contributor to the reduced weight. It feels a bit more fragile in comparison to the old GLX. Time will tell..

[b]Power and action:[/b] Here I was a bit (positively) surprised. While I expected the mag taper, to me the taper turned out to be much faster than expected. Since I am planning to use the rod mostly for finesse bottom contact activities, this was taper is definitely welcomed. The taper is definitely (as one would expect) very light, but gets into a rather powerful backbone about 1/4 of the rod in. 

[b]Intended use:[/b] 1/8oz texas rigs, micro jigs, small paddle tails and small cranks and lipless 

[b]Fishing experience:[/b]
I had the Conquest spooled with 18.5lb braid to 7lb FC leader. On the water the combo felt very well balanced and was a joy to fish.  It is hard to objectively compare sensitivity here against my other high end rods (Conquest, NRX, Steez, Megabass P5), but I think it was comparable to an NRX (maybe slightly below it). With braid to leader it is more splitting hairs at this level anyways...

Threw a range of lures: Lowes was a 1/16oz jig head with plastic (1/8oz total weight), that I was able to cast somewhat comfortably for 20-25m. Not sure if that was more contributed to the reel than the rod though. Maybe its the combination of the two! 😉

Highest weight was a 1/4oz swimbait jig head with a 3.8oz keitech, which probably got close to 1/2oz). I was able to bomb cast this lure out like there was no morning. While it was quite windy, I still got more than 60m out of it. 

I had only one bite on the combo, but it was the right kind of bite. A 5.6lb largie decided to give my 1/8oz T-rig a try. The fight was a lot of fun and took me almost 3mins to safely land her. 

*rant on* I really would love to upload pictures of the balance point and the action of the rod, but it is just such a PIA to upload pictures on this forum (we have the year 2024 where we have very capable out of the box forum templates that can do that easily and more..) that I just did not want to spend my Sunday on resizing pictures to make them hopefully work... *rant off*


Overall, I would think that the rod is promising and is fairly versatile in its applications. I just do not think that it is worth $600 (with taxes). For $350-400 it would get a recommendation from me. At this price point its a meh. 

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Sweet, I have the 902c split grip. It’s combined w a 22 Shimano Metanium shallow spool edition. It’s a very light combo. I’ve loaded my rod up several times now and it’s definitely extra fast but gets into the middle very nicely.. you can easily see the power transition. (So far so good) I’m not a fan of split grips other than Kistlers, something about Trey’s I love on either casting or spinning. I don’t love his new blank choice. 
 

Anyway, appreciate the follow up and glad you got a replacement relatively quick. 

Btw, what does that conquest weigh?

 

My metanium sse weights like 5.7 I believe.. 

  • Super User
Posted
3 hours ago, freelancer27 said:

Received my GLX 902c on Friday and took it out for a spin on Saturday. Wanted to share my early thoughts on the rod to help others in their possible decision making process.

Reminder: My (old) GLX 892c snapped on me (the rod probably did not like that it was foul hooked and casted into the lake some time before it snapped.. ;D), so I used the Xpeditor program to replace it.

[b]First impressions out of the rod tube:
[/b]
* Rod weight 3.73oz, the 892c came in at 4.31oz, which is great deal of weight reduction given the additional length and its full cork handle!!
* Weight reduction would not mean nothing, if balance was off. I am happy to report that the rod balances really well. I am using a Calcutta Conquest Shollow Edition on it and the rod balances perfectly with the reel.

[b]Looks:[/b] well, let's put it this way: the black and gold takes a bit of time to get used to. While the Conquest SE's blue tone perfectly matched the old GLX's color tone, it looks a bit displaced on the new GLX. The golden Conquest would look probably perfect on it though. I am not thaaat particular about my gear, so dont think I will change that any time soon.

[b]Fit and finish:[/b] typical Gloomis. It's okay but no where near a Megabass or even a Steez. We all know that.. The blank has little to no epoxy on it (similar to the NRX, is it the same blank?) which I would think is a main contributor to the reduced weight. It feels a bit more fragile in comparison to the old GLX. Time will tell..

[b]Power and action:[/b] Here I was a bit (positively) surprised. While I expected the mag taper, to me the taper turned out to be much faster than expected. Since I am planning to use the rod mostly for finesse bottom contact activities, this was taper is definitely welcomed. The taper is definitely (as one would expect) very light, but gets into a rather powerful backbone about 1/4 of the rod in. 

[b]Intended use:[/b] 1/8oz texas rigs, micro jigs, small paddle tails and small cranks and lipless 

[b]Fishing experience:[/b]
I had the Conquest spooled with 18.5lb braid to 7lb FC leader. On the water the combo felt very well balanced and was a joy to fish.  It is hard to objectively compare sensitivity here against my other high end rods (Conquest, NRX, Steez, Megabass P5), but I think it was comparable to an NRX (maybe slightly below it). With braid to leader it is more splitting hairs at this level anyways...

Threw a range of lures: Lowes was a 1/16oz jig head with plastic (1/8oz total weight), that I was able to cast somewhat comfortably for 20-25m. Not sure if that was more contributed to the reel than the rod though. Maybe its the combination of the two! 😉

Highest weight was a 1/4oz swimbait jig head with a 3.8oz keitech, which probably got close to 1/2oz). I was able to bomb cast this lure out like there was no morning. While it was quite windy, I still got more than 60m out of it. 

I had only one bite on the combo, but it was the right kind of bite. A 5.6lb largie decided to give my 1/8oz T-rig a try. The fight was a lot of fun and took me almost 3mins to safely land her. 

*rant on* I really would love to upload pictures of the balance point and the action of the rod, but it is just such a PIA to upload pictures on this forum (we have the year 2024 where we have very capable out of the box forum templates that can do that easily and more..) that I just did not want to spend my Sunday on resizing pictures to make them hopefully work... *rant off*


Overall, I would think that the rod is promising and is fairly versatile in its applications. I just do not think that it is worth $600 (with taxes). For $350-400 it would get a recommendation from me. At this price point its a meh. 


sounds like a winner. I’m considering a similar power and length rod for the same applications but not spending that much. 
 

for uploading pictures, if you’re using an Apple product it’s dead simple. Click the choose files under this text box, select the pictures, and after you tap the picture the window will show ‘show selected’. Tap there and pick the size that gets it down around 1mb. 

Posted
3 hours ago, alonerankin2 said:

Sweet, I have the 902c split grip. It’s combined w a 22 Shimano Metanium shallow spool edition. It’s a very light combo. I’ve loaded my rod up several times now and it’s definitely extra fast but gets into the middle very nicely.. you can easily see the power transition. (So far so good) I’m not a fan of split grips other than Kistlers, something about Trey’s I love on either casting or spinning. I don’t love his new blank choice. 
 

Anyway, appreciate the follow up and glad you got a replacement relatively quick. 

Btw, what does that conquest weigh?

 

My metanium sse weights like 5.7 I believe.. 

Interesting! I did not know that there was a 902c in split grip! Is that an older version? 

  • Super User
Posted
22 minutes ago, freelancer27 said:

Interesting! I did not know that there was a 902c in split grip! Is that an older version? 

Couldn’t say for sure, but I bought it in February this past. When they were closing out the previous model, but who can say 🤣

Posted
11 hours ago, alonerankin2 said:

Couldn’t say for sure, but I bought it in February this past. When they were closing out the previous model, but who can say 🤣

If its is not black and gold, its the previous model. But even there I did not know that they had this specific model. 

Posted

I don't believe the NRX plus and GLX are the same rod blank as asked above. 

 

Loomis doesn't take a blank, put different components on it and call it something different. 

  • Super User
Posted
4 hours ago, freelancer27 said:

If its is not black and gold, its the previous model. But even there I did not know that they had this specific model. 

Probably because I made an error. Mine is a 892c JWR so my mistake. 

IMG_1060.jpeg

IMG_1063.jpeg

IMG_1064.jpeg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.