Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That was fascinating and yet another great video that suggests that fishing is evolving and livescope is, perhaps counterintuitively, a money saver and could result in better conservation practices by anglers that are going to be catching them one way or another anyway.

 

I kinda liked the narrative promoting a small electric motor craft angler with limited but useful rods reels and baits and a powerful piece of technology.  2000$ seems a lot smaller when you consider the barrier to entry up until the advent of the scope, was a 100,000$ boat, 20 rods and 4 graphs.  Process of elimination gets fairly expensive fairly quickly when you turn out the lights.

 

Maybe the only entity that really needs to worry about livescope, ironically, is the tackle industry!

 

🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

 

Sure seems like an interesting take on the whole debate to me!

  • Like 2
Posted

I admit I didn't watch the whole thing...does anyone take fizzing into consideration?

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm 100% catch and release and always have a fizzing needle in the boat.  Most people do not.

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Maybe just don’t target fish so deep. Seems pretty simple to me.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted

He’s also looking for views, likes, and subscribers on YouTube.

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
  • Super User
Posted

"Now I'm not a biologist..."

 

Huh. You don't say.

 

Wonder why the DNR is staffed with scientists rather than, say, YouTube content creators?  I'm sure it's all a government plot to "threaten our angling rights" 🙄

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
  • Super User
Posted
5 hours ago, MIbassyaker said:

Wonder why the DNR is staffed with scientists

Most of them are.  Not all of them.

 

Some of the top positions are political appointees, not career tenured positions based on education, qualifications, or experience.  They are replaced every 4 or 8 years depending on who the governor is.  I won't get into the politics of it but let's just say I don't think the commissioner or deputy commissioner of the DNR is qualified to currently hold those positions.

  • Like 4
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I’m a biologist…….

 

what does that tell you about the required criteria? 😂 

  • Haha 4
  • Sad 1
  • Super User
Posted
14 minutes ago, TnRiver46 said:

I’m a biologist…….

 

Armchair biologist. :jackinthebox:

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Global Moderator
Posted

Honestly the kid does a pretty good job, and he said rule number one would be just don’t fish that deep. 
 

you’d be surprised how haphazard some fish and wildlife studies are, they could probably learn from this fella 

 

he’s clearly familiar with the scientific method and his study is as good as any you will find, looked much better than the one conducted by the MN DNR if I was peer reviewing it 

 

the DNR would probably hire him on the spot after seeing his study but I doubt he wans to take a pay cut 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Super User
Posted
1 hour ago, TnRiver46 said:

I’m a biologist…….

 

what does that tell you about the required criteria? 😂 

:smiley:

A-Jay

  • Haha 4
  • Super User
Posted

I don’t like to needle (fizz) bass because it’s a wound that must heal before the air bladder is functional. 

Every winter seasonal period I see dark colored zombie bass swimming about 5’ down that have been fizzed by other anglers. Sick bass.

The best method is sinking the bass down quickly after catching it in water over 40’ deep. I use a 8 oz torpedo sinker clipped onto anther rod, put the sinker into the basses throat and lower it down, then lift up on the sinker and the bass is released at the proper depth. Easy!

Tom

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, TnRiver46 said:

Honestly the kid does a pretty good job, and he said rule number one would be just don’t fish that deep. 

he’s clearly familiar with the scientific method and his study is as good as any you will find, looked much better than the one conducted by the MN DNR if I was peer reviewing it 

 

 

 

Energy expenditure and angle of descent were not considered in any meaningful way in the MN DNR study.  It's almost complete garbage.

 

scott

  • Like 4
  • Super User
Posted
Just now, TnRiver46 said:

@softwateronly, your license fees hard at work 😂 

He lives in Illinois. License fees in Illinois do not fund studies for the Minnesota DNR.

 

Maybe stick to armchair biology instead of geography. :off-topic:

  • Haha 1
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I don’t know where he lives, “the royal we, man”

 

anniversary celebrate GIF

  • Haha 2
Posted

The kid may not have had the label of a biologist but his common sense went quite a long way considering he was releasing the fish & allowing them to actually swim away without being stopped by a net. Idiocracy has arrived.

Mike Judge Dystopia GIF by Idiocracy

  • Like 3
  • Global Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, TnRiver46 said:

I’m a biologist…….

 

what does that tell you about the required criteria? 😂 

Salma Hayek We Are In Trouble GIF by BAFTA

  • Haha 2
  • Super User
Posted

The kid did a great job making his point and clearly found a flaw in the DNR study.   That said,  I watched the video of the DNR study and they referred to it as a pilot study and said a more scientific study was needed.  They are not saying the study proved anything and are not saying more regulation is required.  They did say it indicates that anglers should consider keeping fish caught in deeper water and then moving shallow after they get their limit.  

  • Like 2
  • Super User
Posted
6 hours ago, TnRiver46 said:

I’m a biologist…….

 

what does that tell you about the required criteria? 😂 

Maybe if you could catch a bass on a spinnerbait, your ability to meet the criteria would increase.

  • Thanks 1
  • Global Moderator
Posted

@king fisher, it’s too late, I’ve already met it. No wire baits required (spinnerbaits are reserved for astrology majors)

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.