Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted

Hey y’all,

 

Curious what you might call this structural feature. Deeper water pinches closer to the shoreline compared to surrounding banks. How do these develop and what is the significance of them? 

B5068949-6217-4251-9DE1-7A1C7116B0CA.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

In the west we call those a ravine, some call them a drain or cut.

Tom

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted
1 hour ago, LrgmouthShad said:

Curious what you might call this structural feature.

 

2 minutes ago, WRB said:

In the west we call those a ravine, some call them a drain or cut.

Tom

Up here we call it a Cut.

 

If you had the topography of the land around there, you might see where it originates as well....usually there's a corresponding land feature - at least in natural lakes...which is basically all we have up in Minne-snow-ta.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted
1 hour ago, LrgmouthShad said:

Hey y’all,

 

Curious what you might call this structural feature. Deeper water pinches closer to the shoreline compared to surrounding banks. How do these develop and what is the significance of them? 

B5068949-6217-4251-9DE1-7A1C7116B0CA.jpeg

 

The above ground topo will show you how it formed.  I bet that there is a minor stream or seep that was there before the lake was flooded.  It eroded down the soil/rock and that's what's left.  Given the round bits at the 'bottom', I'd even suspect there might have been a waterfall there at one point as those look like plunge pools.

Think something like this on a smaller scale.

 

Plunge Pool | This a little waterfall below a foot bridge in… | Flickr

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted
58 minutes ago, WRB said:

In the west we call those a ravine, some call them a drain or cut.

Tom

 

54 minutes ago, MN Fisher said:

Up here we call it a Cut.

 

Ravine, Cut, Drain, or Washout; all are created by rain water running down hill causing erosion. 

 

Would definitely like to see the surrounding topography.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Up here in the Canadian Shield, that could be one of several things. Sometimes it’s like everyone else mentioned, where running water has “cut” through the ground to create a depression, but most times around here that’d just be an “inside turn”. Simply put, it’s a cut, or depression in the rock, but it was made by about a mile thick slab of ice crawling across the land thousands of years ago. 

  • Like 3
  • Super User
Posted

There are a few similar things on my local lake.  Around here we call them sink holes.  It all depends on the surrounding terrain.  :thumbsup:

 

image.thumb.png.cd8ec27e0342caa1e3e32a58bef397a1.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

If the shoreline funnels down to that drop we would call it a "drain" around these parts.  If the shoreline is perfectly level and shows no trace of it we would call it "weird".  I'm fishing it either way. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Super User
Posted

Simply judging by the straight road way adjacent to the structure feature it appears to relatively flat to gentle sloping terrain.

This makes the structure nearly un noticed and more then likely less fishing pressure. 

 

  • Like 4
Posted

LrgmouthShad, is this a man made lake?

  • Super User
Posted

The significance of them is that fish like to have close access to deep water when they are feeding on flats or weed edges, so they most likely will use them as refuge when they leave shallow water and going to and from shallow water.  I would check them out regularly, and the shallows (meaning the less deep flats between them) close to them.  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted
43 minutes ago, Tennessee Boy said:

I would love to see a google earth image of the surrounding landscape.   

 

YES!

 

And a more detailed topographic map. Based off what I see, nothing interests me.

  • Like 5
  • Super User
Posted

 That is one weird looking area and look at those three deep holes . I never seen anything like it .    . 

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted
22 hours ago, Tennessee Boy said:

I would love to see a google earth image of the surrounding landscape.   

 

21 hours ago, Catt said:

 

YES!

 

And a more detailed topographic map. Based off what I see, nothing interests me.

I can work on this later. Thanks y’all.

 

Been too busy to do it yet

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

What ever you want to call it I see that middle one getting some jigging spoons in that deep depression.

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

So I'm not the OP and I'm not going to put out what lake it is, but with a little guestimation and 10 minuets of time looking at maps, I've found the spot.  I'm going to pose an alternative hypothesis that no one has put out yet- quality of data.  And the only way to confirm that will be for the OP to get on the water with a depth finder and map it himself.

 

Original image:

 

B5068949-6217-4251-9DE1-7A1C7116B0CA.jpeg

 

 

My own image from same website (his 40' teardrop at top matches my bottom of the three):

 

image.thumb.png.c06f51f7364adca92e4df7f9e3181a86.png

 

Google earth/terrain shows flat all around, though right at the water line there is a bit of a bluff.  Looking at this lake zoomed out, it appears to be a missouri bluff style lake similar to Lake Truman or Lake of the Ozarks.  I can't snip google earth small enough for some reason, but you can see actual minor cuts like this all up and down the shoreline for the whole lake.  I suspect those are actual erosion cuts, but we're talking 10-20' wide. There are also 3 boats on this quarter mile strip, so its not an unknown honey hole.

 

You can also see these much larger drains in the depth map on fishermap all over the lake.  But if you look critically at them as a whole instead of one by one, you can see that they follow the creek channel down the whole lake.  When you compare vs Navionics, it is a much more smooth view of the lake:

 

 

image.thumb.png.2ea122bda97a3fc24c9387b6371d8e46.png

 

 

I recon that there IS some under water variation on the bottom, but that the fishermap depth map has limited data points.  Its taken the main lake creek bed spots that are deep and in between extrapolated that the cuts run right up to the shoreline.  Navionics probably has better data and more data points to make a smoother graph.

 

Unfortunately, the only way to really confirm it is to map it in person (or talk to someone who has fished it and can confirm it).  

 

<\internet sleuthing off>

 

thanks

rick

 

 

Here is a little snip from google maps.

 

image.thumb.png.edf36b909b28b54551dbe7341edb0ec7.png

  • Like 4
  • Super User
Posted
31 minutes ago, casts_by_fly said:

So I'm not the OP and I'm not going to put out what lake it is, but with a little guestimation and 10 minuets of time looking at maps, I've found the spot.  I'm going to pose an alternative hypothesis that no one has put out yet- quality of data.  And the only way to confirm that will be for the OP to get on the water with a depth finder and map it himself.

 

Original image:

 

B5068949-6217-4251-9DE1-7A1C7116B0CA.jpeg

 

 

My own image from same website (his 40' teardrop at top matches my bottom of the three):

 

image.thumb.png.c06f51f7364adca92e4df7f9e3181a86.png

 

Google earth/terrain shows flat all around, though right at the water line there is a bit of a bluff.  Looking at this lake zoomed out, it appears to be a missouri bluff style lake similar to Lake Truman or Lake of the Ozarks.  I can't snip google earth small enough for some reason, but you can see actual minor cuts like this all up and down the shoreline for the whole lake.  I suspect those are actual erosion cuts, but we're talking 10-20' wide. There are also 3 boats on this quarter mile strip, so its not an unknown honey hole.

 

You can also see these much larger drains in the depth map on fishermap all over the lake.  But if you look critically at them as a whole instead of one by one, you can see that they follow the creek channel down the whole lake.  When you compare vs Navionics, it is a much more smooth view of the lake:

 

 

image.thumb.png.2ea122bda97a3fc24c9387b6371d8e46.png

 

 

I recon that there IS some under water variation on the bottom, but that the fishermap depth map has limited data points.  Its taken the main lake creek bed spots that are deep and in between extrapolated that the cuts run right up to the shoreline.  Navionics probably has better data and more data points to make a smoother graph.

 

Unfortunately, the only way to really confirm it is to map it in person (or talk to someone who has fished it and can confirm it).  

 

<\internet sleuthing off>

 

thanks

rick

 

 

Here is a little snip from google maps.

 

image.thumb.png.edf36b909b28b54551dbe7341edb0ec7.png

Wow. Thank you for that analysis very much. 
 

Didn’t mean to be secretive about the lake. It is the same lake as my dam thread - Pomme de Terre. 
 

As you say, I was curious about those cuts scattered across the shoreline of this lake and wanted to know what they are. Not really sure what I want to be doing with this lake yet. I might be bank-ridden or at some point I might try and take the kayak out for a short spin or rent a boat. We’ll see.

 

Ive found no point to being secretive about large lakes that I fish on. Told everybody I was on Badin in the summer. I’m not a good enough fisherman for anybody to care ?

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Just a dumb Cajun's opinion but while y'all looking at that I be out here looking at this.

 

20221216_090809.png

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted

With the cat out of the bag for what lake it is, here is the Fishermap of the bigger lake I was referring to with the creek channel pockmarks down the lake.  You can't convince me that every one of those is actually a depression on the bottom.  Navionics pretty much agrees.  There are depressions, but its nowhere near as pronounced or as localized as the fishermap.  

 

image.thumb.png.163b7318f19723a12941207bfc5cbd50.png

 

And here is a side by side of the same point further up the lake to illustrate it better.  I generally trust navionics to be pretty close.

 

image.thumb.png.4075874f7a71fb8a8598d954db0e9382.png

  • Super User
Posted
30 minutes ago, Catt said:

Just a dumb Cajun's opinion but while y'all looking at that I be out here looking at this.

 

20221216_090809.png

 

There is a lot of that kinda of stuff on this lake it seems.  This spring I'd be in this area.  All of those steep cuts leading into pre-spawn flats.  I'm not an expert on them, but I bet rolling an A rig through there might be the ticket.

 

image.png.d9e779e5226a0367c066121626eb9244.png

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted
Just now, casts_by_fly said:

 

There is a lot of that kinda of stuff on this lake it seems.  This spring I'd be in this area.  All of those steep cuts leading into pre-spawn flats.  I'm not an expert on them, but I bet rolling an A rig through there might be the ticket.

 

image.png.d9e779e5226a0367c066121626eb9244.png

Oh my. That’s a pretty lookin area

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Look at all them underwater points!

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.