Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted
22 minutes ago, Tennessee Boy said:

Apophenia exist in people not spinner baits.

 

Ya still gotta be able to prove it as the answer.

  • Super User
Posted
6 minutes ago, Catt said:

 

Ya still gotta be able to prove it as the answer.

Science is usually about probability not proof.   We can’t prove anything about what kind of blades a bass prefers on a spinnerbait.  With proper controls and enough data we might be able to show that the differences in the catch rates between two spinnerbaits were statistically significant.   That doesn’t prove one is better than the other but might tell us that there was a 95% chance that bass prefer one over the other and a 5% chance that the results we caused by random chance. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Yep, that happened to me yesterday...well kind of. Anyway, I was fishing a Terminator willow leaf silver and Colorado gold blade. I smoked them. Then I pull out a white Jackhammer chatterbait with a gold blade...nothing. I then switched to a co

chatruese willow/Colorado bladed spinnerbait...nothing. When I switched back the Terminator, they smoked it again! I'm not sure what the deal was, but it leads me to believe color made a huge difference and the correct presentation does too. Both a chatterbait and spinnerbait move water very similarly. I believe flash plays more of a factor than vibration in terms of the spinnerbait, in most situations except muddy water (in muddy water a gold blade can be just as effective). 

  • Super User
Posted

You will never know how bass see until you can determine how their brain interprets the color spectrum. Until we use What works for us from feedback from the bass we catch by trail and error.

You want to debate information being shared by successful bass anglers and want proof, look at the catch records.

Not everything in life is black and white, lots of shades of gray tend to cloud our beliefs.

Tom 

  • Like 3
  • Super User
Posted
6 hours ago, Tennessee Boy said:

Science is usually about probability not proof.

 

That would be theory 

  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted
4 hours ago, Catt said:

 

That would be theory 

Exactly,  I would use the word hypothesis here.  Along with a probability that the hypothesis is correct based on the observed data.

  • Super User
Posted
On 5/1/2022 at 10:09 AM, lunkerboss923 said:

Both a chatterbait and spinnerbait move water very similarly.

They don't.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/2/2022 at 6:37 PM, Deleted account said:

They don't.

Oh but they do Deleter. Oh but they do. 

  • Super User
Posted
5 hours ago, lunkerboss923 said:

Oh but they do Deleter. Oh but they do. 

Not in the real world, but all kind of crazy in TX, so maybe...

Posted
On 4/30/2022 at 1:56 PM, ironbjorn said:

My girl's cat is a mental psychopath so the vet recommended she get this pheromone system. I'm starting to wonder if it's because the baits I have pre-rigged are getting this crap on them and the bass don't like it.

I bet the catfish love them.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.