Jeffrey Walker Posted August 1, 2021 Posted August 1, 2021 Which would you pick and why? Looks like the new NRX lineup just stole Conquest technoliogy so is there any reason to pick the NRX over the conquest? Other question is does the NRX JWR bring anything else into the picture? Quote
Super User ATA Posted August 2, 2021 Super User Posted August 2, 2021 yup, you are rights I said before new NRX is conquest with another color. I need to take closer look though to make sure. Quote
mrpao Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 Wish the conquest had more models. Still hate the baby blue color threads on the NRX. Quote
Hulkster Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 the conquest doesn't use recoil guides. I have never used them but i hear that you either love them or you hate them. something to consider Quote
KP Duty Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 Shimano's Conquest and Poison Glorious rods use the same blank. There is a new '21 Poison Glorious utiluzing toray 1100g graphite and nanoplus tech. Id bet this new Glorious blank will be next years 'Conquest +'. Quote
evo2s197 Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 Besides the fact that every NRX is built on a Friday by short attention span teens, they have a hodge podge of recoil and torzite guides, the updated NRX+ has the same blank as the Conquest, without the improved build quality the Conquest usually has. Go with the Conquest or better yet pass on the Glorious and go with the Ultima if you are wanting to stay under the Shimano umbrella. 1 Quote
thunderblack Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 47 minutes ago, evo2s197 said: has the same blank as the Conquest, without the improved build quality the Conquest usually has. My conquest and nrx both looked equally bad. The weird thing is the GLX model I have was perfect. Quote
KP Duty Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 The new NRX+ blank has the addition of 'spiral X construction' , which shimano employs on the Adrena, Glorious , and Ultima. Same graphite/scrim as the OG, and rolled in Wiodland, WA. Quote
evo2s197 Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 2 hours ago, KP Duty said: The new NRX+ blank has the addition of 'spiral X construction' , which shimano employs on the Adrena, Glorious , and Ultima. Same graphite/scrim as the OG, and rolled in Wiodland, WA. The Conquest also has Spiral X. Quote
Jeffrey Walker Posted August 4, 2021 Author Posted August 4, 2021 I really dont understand the new NRX + I guess the only thing that it may have over the conquest is better sensitivity? Is that fair? Anyone have both yet? Quote
Solution Dumbbassanglr Posted August 7, 2021 Solution Posted August 7, 2021 I have both. Conquest is still lighter and stronger, conquest has spiral x AND high power x. The nrx+ only has spiral x. It’s close but if I could only have one I’d go conquest. 1 Quote
Jeffrey Walker Posted August 7, 2021 Author Posted August 7, 2021 Thank you. Which is more sensitive? which models do you have? Quote
Dumbbassanglr Posted August 8, 2021 Posted August 8, 2021 Only conquest I have is 844 mbr but it’s my favorite rod. I also have nrx+ 903, 873, 854 and an 852 spinning. I can’t really say one is more sensitive than the other. I think more than anything the action you are looking for will dictate which one you go with. If you want an mbr action then you can’t go wrong with the conquest. If not then I’m sure you can find something in the nrx+ line that will fit the bill. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.