Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted

I have an old Heddon fiberglass fly rod my dad bought I think in the early to mid 1960s.                              On my rod the line weight is marked "H". A coworker is a fly rod guy, and has a newer rod. The line weight on his rod is marked as "6". I've made a bet with him.                                                          He claims that fly rods were marked with a letter for line weight well into the 1980s. I say he's wrong. I say the letter for line weight stopped by 1970, and changed to a number system.                   I really don't know a lot about fly rod fishing . For the fly fisherman here, what's the correct answer? 

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Neither answer is correct.

Silk lines were sized by diameter and a ( or a series of) letter(s). synthetic lines are sized by weight and a number. So numbers go back to the first synthetic lines, and letters go through the last silk lines. There are still some "purists" who use cane rods with natural lines, but those are mostly sized by weight, and more often trial and error. Bass fished in the Catskills in the early '70s, and you needed to know your trout just for the street cred, 

  • Like 3
  • Super User
Posted

Fly line changed in 1955.

Tom 

  • Thanks 1
  • Super User
Posted

the H is only part of the original line marking.  

The line rating was either HEH (now DT5), HDH (DT6) or HCH (DT7)

Capture.JPG.bd723eecddc1b52ea07504d455c808c3.JPG

 

The latest rod I have marked HDH for 6-wt is Orvis Fullflex A glass, bought new in 1979.  

 

The earliest rod I have marked #6 is a Phillipson made for LL Bean, c. 1971, so there's clearly some overlap in the conventions.  

LLB9.jpg

 

Nice photo here of a Phillipson-made Orvis Fullflex - right in the middle of my time brackets above, marked HDG (6) for WF6

fullflex03.jpg

and if you ever get a shot at buying any 7' Phillipson, don't pass go

  • Like 2
  • Super User
Posted
13 hours ago, bulldog1935 said:

the H is only part of the original line marking.  

The line rating was either HEH (now DT5), HDH (DT6) or HCH (DT7)

Capture.JPG.bd723eecddc1b52ea07504d455c808c3.JPG

 

The latest rod I have marked HDH for 6-wt is Orvis Fullflex A glass, bought new in 1979.  

 

The earliest rod I have marked #6 is a Phillipson made for LL Bean, c. 1971, so there's clearly some overlap in the conventions.  

LLB9.jpg

 

Nice photo here of a Phillipson-made Orvis Fullflex - right in the middle of my time brackets above, marked HDG (6) for WF6

fullflex03.jpg

and if you ever get a shot at buying any 7' Phillipson, don't pass go

Wow!  Very nice. 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.