G. Loomis questions

[Bandersnatch]

On 1/26/2021 at 9:34 PM, Boomstick said:

How much better is subjective, but the Expride is undoubtedly a better value and a $230 Expride is a steal. One thing to consider is the GLoomis MBRs do make very good jig rods.

I would somewhat agree. While I wouldn’t say you can’t fish a jig well on an Mbr it wouldn’t be my first choice. You can do anything on a conquest 844C but it’s not going to be perfect for 1/2 of those things 

 

3 hours ago, Eddie101 said:

I’m torn between NRX+ 853JWR/NRX+853MBR/Conquest 853MBR

 

If you were me, what would you pick? I’m looking for a rod that can do plastic baits as well as jigs(1/4 to 1/2) Also, what’s so special about Conquest line anyway? It’s at least $100 more than aforementioned rods that are pretty pricey themselves. Is it worth the $$ or just a marketing gimmick? 

I’m going to assume you know the conquest simply isn’t a $$ marketing gimmick…

 

Prior to NRX+, the conquest had a completely different lineup & taper as compared to the NRX. Highest end guides, full cork, the feeling of unlimited strength, and yes, they weigh even less than the NRX.  Enter the NRX+ MBR lineup, and I believe those that have fished the NRX version prefer the feel & power of the conquest wrapping.

 

 

[rangerjockey]

I personally don't think the conquest is worth the extra cost. It certainly isn't more sensitive than NRX.

It was designed to have more torsional strength but now that NRX +has spiral X I'm not sure that's true anymore.

I personally like the NRX in the 85 inch versions over the 89's . The 853 has always been my favorite but a 1/2 oz is pushing it.

 

[Eddie101]

3 hours ago, rangerjockey said:

I personally don't think the conquest is worth the extra cost. It certainly isn't more sensitive than NRX.

It was designed to have more torsional strength but now that NRX +has spiral X I'm not sure that's true anymore.

I personally like the NRX in the 85 inch versions over the 89's . The 853 has always been my favorite but a 1/2 oz is pushing it.

 

Which NRX+ version(s) do you have? I suppose 854 should be able to handle 1/2 and maybe up to 3/4? Is 854JWR just as versatile as 853? Should I get both 853 and 854 and be done with it for the next ten years till they come out with a newer/improved version of NRX+?

[rangerjockey]

I have a couple 853's one is the +and an 854 and 872s in the original model. I sold a 893 and 854.

I like the CI4 reel seat on the plus models.

I use the JWR's strictly for dragging something. If versatility is your goal I'd buy a MBR 844.

You can use the jWR's for moving baits but I think there are less expensive options

[FishTank]

Since I added my comment on this back in January 2021, I have added 843, 904, 802, 895, and 873 CCR to my NRX casting rod collection. 

 

The 904C has become my favorite 1/2 jig rod. The 843 has been great Texas rigged soft plastic with a 1/8 bullet weight or stuff on free rig. Both of these rods are great at pretty much everything except crankbaits.  

 

The 802 is pretty much a finnese rod for me. The 895 is a beast of a jig/punching rod. It has become a questionable purchase for me but for what it is, it's fantastic. 

 

Then finally, the 873 is sort of the unicorn of the bunch. It fits well between the 904 and the 853. It's not as stout as the 904 but its got a fuzz more power than the 853 and 843. The tip is similar to the 904 but not as fast as 853. I use it for spinnerbaits, topwater, soft plastic and jigs. I actually didn't care for it much as a Carolina Rig rod. Not 100%, but I think this maybe the right rod for @Eddie101.

[Boomstick]

On 6/26/2023 at 1:31 AM, Bandersnatch said:

While I wouldn’t say you can’t fish a jig well on an Mbr it wouldn’t be my first choice.

I should be more specific - for structure fishing in open water and light weeds, not wood or moderate or heavy cover. But the taper is great for open water.