All about da bass Posted April 17, 2018 Posted April 17, 2018 Would a soft plastic frog like a Ribbit or would a popping frog like spro work better as far as getting the most bites? Quote
Super User Choporoz Posted April 17, 2018 Super User Posted April 17, 2018 Yes. There was a whole article devoted to that in a recent Bassmaster magazine...the guys that like toads say 'toads'...the guys that like frogs say 'frogs'. I prefer frogs, but will admit that I haven't fished toads enough to make it a contest 3 Quote
Super User Deleted account Posted April 17, 2018 Super User Posted April 17, 2018 On a given day one may outfish the other and vise versa. We see this a lot on the Potomac with both bass and snakeheads. 1 Quote
Super User tcbass Posted April 17, 2018 Super User Posted April 17, 2018 I never had great luck with hollow body frogs. Caught a few, lost a few but never great success. Had a ton of success with Rage Toads, either catching fish on the splashdown, letting them sink, or on the retreive. Their achilles heel is that they are disposable and you can go through quiet a few. Last year (granted, it's only a years worth of R&D) I made Homemade Sprinker Teckel Frog with a Spro Frog, #4 VMC 3 way swivel, and Teckel Sprinker Frog tail because I didn't want to wait for the real Teckel Sprinker Frog to come out (it sucked btw). I caught a ton of fish on this lure. Like one time, 4 in a row. It was crazy. Have never had such good luck with any frog. It was a brown one. Now that Booyah is coming out with their cheaper knock-off of the Teckel frog I am going to try that. It seems to be all of the best features of a toad + hollow body combined, minus the sinking feature which sometimes really catches fish. 1 Quote
Global Moderator Bluebasser86 Posted April 18, 2018 Global Moderator Posted April 18, 2018 Frogs are more versatile imo, because they can be paused for long periods or fished quickly. Of course they can't be allowed to sink down into holes or near cover like a toad can, which is deadly at times. 2 Quote
Super User TOXIC Posted April 18, 2018 Super User Posted April 18, 2018 Totally different applications as has been said. I use both. SPRO Hollow body (usually popping) for slow retrievs and pausing over opn spots and Yamamoto solid body Buzz Frogs for a steady retrieve. I have been known to let a SPRO fill up with water and let it sink in mat holes as well. Quote
Global Moderator Mike L Posted April 18, 2018 Global Moderator Posted April 18, 2018 Only the fish knows what they want at any given place or time. Throw em both and "listen" to what they tell you. Mike 1 Quote
Super User Boomstick Posted April 18, 2018 Super User Posted April 18, 2018 I'm not going to tell you what you will catch more fish on, but I am going to tell you that in my opinion fishing the hollow body frog is just more fun. 1 Quote
Super User NorthernBasser Posted April 19, 2018 Super User Posted April 19, 2018 I like using both. I use hollow body frogs more tho. Starting using these last year. Z man Pop Shadz. 5" version. They float and have a cupped mouth, making it pop and spit water. You rig them weightless Texas rig. They made from ElaZtech plastic, the same durable stretchy plastic used on the TRD's. They really excel in lily pads. They work around and through the openings very nicely. And they have a great hookup ratio. 2 Quote
All about da bass Posted April 19, 2018 Author Posted April 19, 2018 1 hour ago, NorthernBasser said: I like using both. I use hollow body frogs more tho. Starting using these last year. Z man Pop Shadz. 5" version. They float and have a cupped mouth, making it pop and spit water. You rig them weightless Texas rig. They made from ElaZtech plastic, the same durable stretchy plastic used on the TRD's. They really excel in lily pads. They work around and through the openings very nicely. And they have a great hookup ratio. Those look really good. May start using those. Thanks guys, just wanted to not waste time on one or the other. 1 Quote
Super User the reel ess Posted April 19, 2018 Super User Posted April 19, 2018 I say frogs, but I'm biased. I also fish places with a lot of vegetation. I've tried toads with less success. But, honestly, I haven't given them the time I've given a frog. Quote
BassNJake Posted April 19, 2018 Posted April 19, 2018 I'm a toad guy but my lake has next to nothing when it comes to vegetation. The toad is really good at covering water and exposing fish that are hidden in the rocks. Sometimes they will just hammer the toad and other times they just show themselves taking a peak at what the commotion was. This will allow me to toss a shakey head or a senko to these fish that are not as aggressive I like to impart the "Alabama shake" during parts of my retrieve as it allows the bait to stay a little more in place while creating more disturbance than just the legs. Many of my bites will come as I pause the bait after the shaking Quote
Super User Ratherbfishing Posted April 19, 2018 Super User Posted April 19, 2018 Apples and oranges. Apples and oranges. Quote
Super User Bankbeater Posted April 19, 2018 Super User Posted April 19, 2018 Way to many undefined variables for me to say one way or the other. What is the temp, depth, wind, and cover like? Quote
All about da bass Posted April 20, 2018 Author Posted April 20, 2018 Thick, warm, 5 to 6 ft. 2 hours ago, Bankbeater said: Way to many undefined variables for me to say one way or the other. What is the temp, depth, wind, and cover like? Quote
FishDewd Posted April 21, 2018 Posted April 21, 2018 On 4/18/2018 at 7:51 PM, NorthernBasser said: I like using both. I use hollow body frogs more tho. Starting using these last year. Z man Pop Shadz. 5" version. They float and have a cupped mouth, making it pop and spit water. You rig them weightless Texas rig. They made from ElaZtech plastic, the same durable stretchy plastic used on the TRD's. They really excel in lily pads. They work around and through the openings very nicely. And they have a great hookup ratio. Speaking of Z man, they also have floating soft frogs in two sizes: larger "Hard Legz Frogs" and small "Finesse Frogs". I have a pack of both that I've played with. They both seem like they'd have promise in the ideal circumstances, though I like the larger ones better because the small ones are somewhat hard to match a hook with, and kinda difficult to throw cause they're so light. Both are walkable, I'm just not real good at it on my current rods. But they skip like no tomorrow for sure. 1 Quote
Super User Bankbeater Posted April 21, 2018 Super User Posted April 21, 2018 On 4/19/2018 at 7:39 PM, All about da bass said: Thick, warm, 5 to 6 ft. I'd put a 1/8 ounce weight on a toad and fish it like it was a creature bait. Quote
Super User MassYak85 Posted April 22, 2018 Super User Posted April 22, 2018 Neither is better, they are tools and excel in different conditions. Ribbits will get absolutely murdered sometimes if the fish are aggresive but sometimes they like slower moving target. Quote
Global Moderator TnRiver46 Posted April 22, 2018 Global Moderator Posted April 22, 2018 On 4/19/2018 at 4:24 PM, Ratherbfishing said: Apples and oranges. Apples and oranges. Hahahah. Exactly Quote
Graham Posted April 22, 2018 Posted April 22, 2018 Situational I would presume, I almost only throw hollow body and popping frogs though. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.