Scarborough817 Posted October 25, 2017 Posted October 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, J Francho said: Aerodynamics can play a role, though not in this case. As can the actual rod and reel you use, again not in this case. that's what im saying the rod and reel are the same so that isn't the issue the only difference would be the weight and the design of the bait i have found that because the spro's are made of a harder material they are more likely to keep their shape during flight and be less effected by wind 1 Quote
Super User tcbass Posted October 25, 2017 Author Super User Posted October 25, 2017 36 minutes ago, Scarborough817 said: why shouldn't it the bait weighs less than the spro Its a minuscule amount, almost same exact weight which is why I think they should cast the same. Quote
Super User Chris at Tech Posted October 25, 2017 Super User Posted October 25, 2017 Holy overthinking, Batman! Quote
primetime Posted October 26, 2017 Posted October 26, 2017 I will say, for some reason, The Spro Poppin frogs seem to cast much further than you would expect. Same with the bronzeye shad, I think it is the shape and how they cut through the wind. With that said, The booyah frog is as good as any for the most part, but if you want casting distance, the Spro Poppin frog and bronzeye shad seem to cast a good 20% further than all my other frogs. Hook sets kind of suck on really long casts however. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.