Global Moderator Bluebasser86 Posted September 22, 2017 Global Moderator Posted September 22, 2017 9 hours ago, Hog Basser said: My place on Beaver has never gotten near 30', that's only up by the dam you can get that. The farther away you get, the less clarity. I'm normally at 6' or so, of course with all the rain earlier this year it was at the chocolate milk stage of clarity for the first few months of the summer. I think that's pretty standard about anywhere. I've seen it pretty clear all the way to PC, but that was "only" about 8' visibility. We launched from Indian Creek last time and it was crazy how clear it was, makes for some tough fishing. Quote
ClackerBuzz Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 I forget which pro gave the recommendation during his seminar but it's helped me tremendously: in clear water, start fishing where the visibility ends. If there is 6 ft of clarity don't waste ur time fishing 6ft or less. Fish 6ft deeper. Also specifically look for structure/cover just past the loss of visibility i.e. 6-8ft 2 Quote
Super User Bankbeater Posted September 22, 2017 Super User Posted September 22, 2017 I like the water to be clear enough so that I can see the stumps before I hit them. 3 Quote
Global Moderator TnRiver46 Posted September 22, 2017 Global Moderator Posted September 22, 2017 4 hours ago, ClackerBuzz said: I forget which pro gave the recommendation during his seminar but it's helped me tremendously: in clear water, start fishing where the visibility ends. If there is 6 ft of clarity don't waste ur time fishing 6ft or less. Fish 6ft deeper. Also specifically look for structure/cover just past the loss of visibility i.e. 6-8ft This is probably excellent advice 90 something percent of the time but I love fishing gin clear water (10+ ft visibility) with a wake bait or spook. You better have your adult diapers on when a big smallmouth comes up from 20 ft to hit a topwater 1 Quote
Hog Basser Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 13 hours ago, Bluebasser86 said: I think that's pretty standard about anywhere. I've seen it pretty clear all the way to PC, but that was "only" about 8' visibility. We launched from Indian Creek last time and it was crazy how clear it was, makes for some tough fishing. Yeah, I'm down below the Hwy 12 bridge at Monte Ne, PC is where it starts clearing up, but I've been up to the dam and could see bottom at 20'. We have some tributaries that muck things up a little more on our end. Quote
Mr. Aquarium Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 yup here in MA, i fish anything from super clear to tannic tea colored water! Quote
Super User Columbia Craw Posted September 23, 2017 Super User Posted September 23, 2017 This is my standard: 2 feet or less is dirty 2 to 5 feet is stained 5 to 12 feet clear 12 feet or more is gin clear 1 Quote
Super User the reel ess Posted September 26, 2017 Super User Posted September 26, 2017 5 to 6' visibility (to the human eye) would be clear water here. But nearby Lake Murray has water clarity more like 10 or 12'. Quote
Fishing_FF Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 When I started fishing, I struggled with the definition of what was clear versus murky. Here in Central Florida, unless you are the the natural spring base, the water is stained to varying degrees. Wekiva, Alexander, Blue Springs, are all clear at the source, but travel down the river and they all get darker. The other day, I was reading Al Linder's The Secret Teachings of In-Fisherman Angling Wisdom & Knowledge. In the Total Angling - Putting Ot Together chapter, Mr. Linder has a section on water clarity. His definitions are based "...on how deep a white lure is visible: 0-2' dark, 2-6 stained', and 6' or greater is clear." I was looking to learn more about the F+L+P formula when I found this nugget. Simple and straightforward, no motor or secchi disk needed. Quote
Super User slonezp Posted September 27, 2017 Super User Posted September 27, 2017 I didn't realize there was so much confusion in the definition of clear. If I can see 30ft down in 30ft of water, that's clear. If I can't...it aint Quote
RPreeb Posted September 27, 2017 Posted September 27, 2017 At my closest pond, there is no place where the bottom isn't visible, max depth is about 8-9 feet. Even at an angle which increases the relative viewing depth, I can see the bottom. For fishing purposes, that's pretty clear. It's been like that all year. Even a heavy thunderstorm doesn't change the clarity, because there is no feeder stream. The pond is fed from a well, so the water coming in is always pure. It grows a good crop of various weeds, but I've not yet seen anything like an algae bloom to reduce clarity. Other local lakes have varying clarity through the summer, and that can change sharply at the thermocline. As a former scuba diver, I've been in fresh water where it was a bit murky as I started down, then hit about 15-20 feet and go through into the colder water under the thermocline and it turns clear, like driving out of a fog bank. Quote
Super User J Francho Posted September 27, 2017 Super User Posted September 27, 2017 I generally evaluate the term per the body of water. I was on Lake Ontario this weekend, and I would say it was somewhat clear. I lost the bottom at around 18'. In spring and late fall, you can sometimes see bottom in 30+. Switch that to a lake like Oneida, and I might call clear 5-8'. Quote
Super User soflabasser Posted September 27, 2017 Super User Posted September 27, 2017 This weekend I fished a body of water where I can see bass swimming on the bottom of 15 feet of water from land. I would say that is considered clear water. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.