DN3 Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 Which is more important...The rod or reel? Just looking for thoughts and opinions! Able to purchase part of my new baitcastingreel combo next week. Quote
Super User MickD Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 Bait casting, the reel. Fly fishing and spinning the rod. In the latter case, exc for the drag, the reels just hold line. 1 Quote
bigturtle Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 at low price points (sub$70), the reel is more important because its more prone to breakage. At mid price points($100-200) the rod takes priority because the performance of reels are about the same in that price point. At higher price points ($300-500) its a toss up Quote
DN3 Posted March 21, 2017 Author Posted March 21, 2017 Price range is $175-$250 for either the rod or the reel, can only get one for now Quote
Super User rippin-lips Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 For me they're even because I plan to keep them for quite some time. I want a quality reel that with proper maintenance will last me 5yrs or more. I want a quality rod that is well built and as sensitive as I can get for the money I can spend on it. Warranty plays a small part also. You have a great budget and you can get a solid combo for $400-500. I'd put $250 into a rod and $200 into a reel. 2 Quote
Fishin' Fool Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 It's a legit question and I think if you asked 10 different people you'd get 5 different answers. I say the rod. 1 Quote
Super User RoLo Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 You can fish with a cane pole without any reel, but it would be mighty cumbersome to fish with a reel without any rod. In the crudest sense, the rod is the workhorse, and the reel is a line rack. Roger 1 Quote
WI_Angler1989 Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 I'd say get a high end rod first. I've had tremendous success with pflueger president reels. A high end reel by no stretch of the imagination. When I got my first rod in your price range (st croix avid then legend tournament bass), my fishing experience sky rocketed. The sensitivity gained from a quality rod will make all the difference. 2 Quote
Super User fishnkamp Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 For me that is easy. I have come to really like all of the Daiwa Tatulas. You can get a Daiwa Tatula CT for $100 shipped to your door. That reel is a workhorse. It is smooth, has a terrific braking braking system and a smooth drag. This is a reel you will keep using not upgrade from. With your budget that leaves you $150 for a rod. The $125 to $175 price range is a very competitive market. There are terrific rods for all techniques, available for that price. Look at rod manufacturers like Irod, Powell, Dobyns, Daiwa, Falcon, Lews, St Croix, Abu Garcia, Duckett and others. Yes you could spend $250 on a reel and then sometime in the future spend $300 or more on a rod. It will be a nice combo but for that much money I would own two very good combos and catch a lot of fish. I fish rods from each of those rod builders and in deed catch a lot of fish with them. 1 Quote
ThatZX14Fella Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 The rod. You can catch fish with the cheapest reel possible, but if you can't feel the bite, you won't know to set the hook. That being said, I spend more on the reel than the rod because I enjoy smooth, high quality reels. Quote
Super User flechero Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 It depends on how you fish, assuming you have a serviceable rod and reel now. If you are a crankbait/spinnerbait, chunk and wind all day kind of guy, a better reel will benefit you more... if you are a soft plastics, feel kind of guy, the rod is infinitely more valuable. 7 Quote
Finnz922 Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 For me it goes rod, line, then reel. That being said, I do own some $300+ Daiwas 2 Quote
crypt Posted March 21, 2017 Posted March 21, 2017 for this thread.rod. but overall, rod, lure, line,reel, in that order. 1 Quote
Super User Raul Posted March 21, 2017 Super User Posted March 21, 2017 Both are important to me, my reel costs about the same the cost of the rod. 2 Quote
RMax Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 Rod for bottom contact or baits that aren't always moving, reel for moving baits and top water because you get long casts 3 Quote
dwardmba Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 Depends on what you are fishing but at some point the benefits plateau. Buy a good rod to a point and a good reel to a point. A $200 rod (or reel) with a $50 reel (or rod) seems silly. I would spend $125 on each or $150 and $100. Dave Quote
Chance_Taker4 Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 I say Rod. Now a days $80-$100 reels can compete with high end reels you pay for weight reduction and shiny parts. But there is a large gap between $100 and $200 rods. 1 Quote
Loomis13 Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 Depends on the technique the rod is going to be used for! Quote
Super User soflabasser Posted March 22, 2017 Super User Posted March 22, 2017 The reel is more important than the rod,especially if your targeting fish that can peel a decent amount of line off the reel. Quote
Bass fishing is best Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 Great responses in here. Only thing I can add is in my 30 years of fishing I've broken many more rods than reels, something to keep in mind. I own Shimano casting and spinning, as well as Pfueger spinning. The only reel I've had go is a Shimano that was literally my first nicer reel probably lasted 25 years of abuse. I've broken poles from Ugly stiks to st. croix and even a BPS, my fault every time but they are much more delicate. Quote
5Keepers Posted March 22, 2017 Posted March 22, 2017 11 hours ago, DN3 said: Which is more important...The rod or reel? Just looking for thoughts and opinions! Able to purchase part of my new baitcastingreel combo next week. The trick is to get a reel that works with the rod you have... unless you have been fishing for a while and are able to take many different reels and use them on different rods (lengths and actions) you will never know what works the best... ... the best reels always work best on the best rods.... match the reel spec's (wide spools for vibrating baits long casts) to the rod's action for what you want to use the combo for! Just make sure you like the feel in your hands. Quote
Super User *Hootie Posted March 22, 2017 Super User Posted March 22, 2017 Try fishing, first the rod with no reel, then the reel with no rod. I think you will find, they are equally important. Hootie 2 Quote
Super User kickerfish1 Posted March 22, 2017 Super User Posted March 22, 2017 Both are important if quality is what you are after. For a bottom contact set up I prefer a lighter magnesium frame reel and a nicer rod that is light with good feel. For a reaction baits set up I am fine with an aluminium reel that is a bit heavy and a budget to mid tier rod. I might be looking at spending $600 for a jig and worm outfit and $300 on a reaction bait setup. Quote
Super User NYWayfarer Posted March 22, 2017 Super User Posted March 22, 2017 I have caught just as many fish with my Mitchell 300 Ugly Stick combo as I have on my Pflueger Supreme St. Croix Premier combo. That being said with the Premier I have felt every nibble, every rock I have dragged my bait over and every weed I dragged my bait through. So my answer to the OP's question is the rod is more important. Mind you that is my answer for spinning. In the baitcasting world the reel seems to be more important. Cheap baitcasting reels with a few exceptions, won't hold up over the long haul. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.