Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Super User
Posted

Which line is more sensitive:

15lb Big Game or Yo Zuri Hybrid 15lb?

In whose hands is the rod? ;)

  • Like 2
  • Super User
Posted

In whose hands is the rod? ;)

Great truth in that! I will take the copoly every time. Catt manages to catch a few fish on the Big Game though!

Posted

Big Game is fairly stretchy, more than Yozuri Hybrid it seems to me.  Less stretch = more sensitivity.  I think Yozuri has a small edge in quality.  If nothing else, it has better diameter consistency.   But Big Game is a solid line that has been catching fish for many years.  I use either/or without worrying about it much.

  • Super User
Posted

Less stretch = more sensitivity.

Explain please!

No line stretches until hookset ;)

  • Like 1
Posted

My experience is the same as BobP's. The less stretch a line has the more sensitive it is. The difference is even more pronounced with a fly rod.

  • Super User
Posted

Ok I got a 1/4 oz bullet weight, a 3/0 hook, & a 6" worm, on mono.

I cast it out, let it sink to the bottom, take up slack, & a bass inhales it.

How does it stretch at this point?

Please explain how the impossible happens?

  • Like 2
  • Super User
Posted

You can´t quantify perception so Catt is absolutely right, it depends of who is holding the rod.

Posted

First, I'm not so sure there are any true "mono" lines that use only one nylon polymer any more, so for all I know Big Game is also a copolymer in the strict sense.  Yozuri is a copoly that blends and extrudes nylon with fluorocarbon.  As far as sensitivity goes, I think nylon or fluoro lines which are more dense at the molecular level tend to be more sensitive and transmit vibration better than less dense lines, all other things held equal.  More dense lines also tend to have less stretch, hence my earlier comment that Catt jumped on.  I would expect in comparing equal diameters of Big Game and YoZuri Hybrid that the Yozuri would be a bit more sensitive in transmitting vibration because the fluoro it contains is more dense than nylon polymer.  This doesn't necessarily have anything to do with feeling a bite when a fish picks up your bait and actively pulls on your line.  We all know that sensing a bite is a lot more complicated than just using one line versus another.  But in the end, I want to stack things in my favor whenever possible, even if they are very small things.    

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

The "line stretch" guys are the guys that have to look at the rod tip to see it wiggle to know there's a bite. "Soft hands" can detect a bite, stretch or not, blindfolded.

  • Super User
Posted

 "Soft hands" can detect a bite, stretch or not, blindfolded.

 

John, are you one of those "soft hands" guys?...

 

 

oe

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Not always, but I do feel the ticks in my arm bones, when it's calm. If it's windy, I struggle, though. I've heard others describe the same sensation.

  • Super User
Posted

You must have a mighty good rod that you are going to feel a difference between those lines. The only lines that make a difference in sensitivity is fluorocarbon and braid, but that only was evident when fishing deep, 15'+ as a shallow bite is picked up with any line.

Posted

Become a line watcher, clear or clear blue fluorescent works best for me. You'll catch fish that you'll never feel with any type of line.

  • Super User
Posted

Not always, but I do feel the ticks in my arm bones, when it's calm. If it's windy, I struggle, though. I've heard others describe the same sensation.

Because you pick up vibrations through a line regardless of stretch, but better if it is more dense, but less stretch means the line will actually react (ie. line jump) which is more visible, or am I getting this wrong?

  • Super User
Posted

Pretty much. Can you feel someone tap on the other end of a vacuum cleaner hose? Can you feel it if someone plucks a guitar string? In which scenario would stretch make a difference? How about density?

  • Super User
Posted

While we can debate the question forever, the simplest answer is that there is no 'one' correct answer. Much of it depends a lot on how you define and try to measure sensitivity. Another thing to keep in mind is that the mechanical properties of the nylon-based materials will change when they get wet, so you have to define whether you are testing wet or dry, and if wet, what percent of moisture absorption we're talking. Again, this will likely vary by manufacturer and formulation. Plus there are the factors of tension, molecular density, diameter, line coiling, etc.. Much easier to just group them as a class of lines and compare against other classes (fluorocarbons, braids, etc.) generally.

 

-T9

  • Super User
Posted

I wonder why dry properties of any line matter at all? I mean, sometimes I fish for squirrels in the trees, but usually I go for fish, and they are under water.

;)

  • Super User
Posted

Gee, I thought I could go five minutes without offending. Guess not.

  • Super User
Posted

I wonder why dry properties of any line matter at all? I mean, sometimes I fish for squirrels in the trees, but usually I go for fish, and they are under water.

;)

 

LOL - :) - they only matter because many of the manufacturers and people who do tests tend to do them all on dry lines, so you have to deal with that when interpreting their results. Plus there is the fact that at least initially, every outfit you throw beginning any fishing day will have line that has 'dry' properties (unless presoaked or sprayed - KVD, etc.), and that line's properties will change (not fluoros or braids) throughout the day the more you fish them. Which all goes back to my point of not having an argument over it until you create the definition or parameters of which you judge....but I get your point ;)

 

 

-T9

  • Super User
Posted

I'm not telling what I "presoak" mine in…

  • Super User
Posted

The difficulty I have is, "less stretch = more sensitivity"

Mono, fluoro, or copoly does not stretch until adequate force in opposite directions is applied or adequate force in one direction while the other end is affixed to an stationary object.

A bass simply picking up a t-rig off the bottom is not enough force to cause line stretch.

  • Like 1
  • Super User
Posted

Here's a little test I try sometimes (probably totally unscientific).

 

Cast your favorite bottom bumping bait (jig. T-rig, whatever it is) out to the depths. Don't count it down, don't watch the line. Can you feel the bait hitting the bottom? Through your rod? What if you hold the line between your thumb and index finger?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Outboard Engine

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.