Sonik Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 Well, I have finally backed the wrong horse with a Cabela's product. I bought a 7'6 XH telescopic handle Fish Eagle 50. By all accounts, this should have been a good rod. What I found is that it is terribly heavy and unbalanced. With a Lew's Tournament Speed Spool (no line) sitting on it, its balance point is a full 8" in front of the reel seat. Retracted into the handle, it balances 3" out. I can't imagine how uncomfortable it would be with a 1.5oz weight tied on. I knew I'd give p a little bit going with the telescopic but that's more than I bargained for. Now I'm debating on whether to get a BPS Extreme that is telescopic or just keep using my 7'3 H rod. The smart man probably would. Quote
Super User Jeff H Posted March 19, 2015 Super User Posted March 19, 2015 Most of those types (telescoping) ARE heavy. Even my Avid is, they all benefit from a balancer too, no matter the brand. I am going to be using my 7'3" Tournament ZX for pitching too Quote
Super User WIGuide Posted March 20, 2015 Super User Posted March 20, 2015 I've got a 7'6" telescopic Quantum Energy PT that I will be replacing this year for the same reason. It's not as out of wack as the Fish Eagle rod, but it's a heavy beast that doesn't balance all that well. Quote
Super User Jeff H Posted March 21, 2015 Super User Posted March 21, 2015 You have to add the balancer to tolerate these rods. No way around it. I don't do a whole lot of actual flippin' but I do still use my Avid telescoping when I do. Not gonna go buy another rod to do that when I don't do it that much. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.