Ozark_Basser Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 Tape, polyurethane, or graphite. Which do you prefer and why? Quote
Super User S Hovanec Posted February 15, 2015 Super User Posted February 15, 2015 I use the poly arbors. They're easy to bore and are rather inexpensive. Not a fan of tape, however, it is used a lot and if properly executed, is just as durable as poly. If tape isn't totally encapsulated in epoxy, it will turn to mush and fail. 1 Quote
FloridaFishinFool Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 I prefer cork for an arbor. It is lightweight and will not crush. Fishermen have been using cork since the 40's or longer. They are easy to make by hand too. 1 Quote
Delaware Valley Tackle Posted February 15, 2015 Posted February 15, 2015 I'll use tape if the gap can be filled with 10 or fewer wraps. Other than that either the poly or graphite arbors. Cork works to if you have a way to turn them and boring too thin they will collapse. Quote
Super User Angry John Posted February 15, 2015 Super User Posted February 15, 2015 I used Polly on the rod I built. Easy to work and cheap. No worry of failure or rot. Quote
Super User .ghoti. Posted February 15, 2015 Super User Posted February 15, 2015 Poly for the most part, unless the gap is too small, then tape. Never used graphite, but I have spinning rod build coming up using a woven graphite tube handle. Got some graphite arbors to try with the tube. 1 Quote
Ozark_Basser Posted February 15, 2015 Author Posted February 15, 2015 Poly for the most part, unless the gap is too small, then tape. Never used graphite, but I have spinning rod build coming up using a woven graphite tube handle. Got some graphite arbors to try with the tube. Same here on the graphite handle. I'm ordering all of my stuff Monday for my first build. Quote
Delaware Valley Tackle Posted February 16, 2015 Posted February 16, 2015 Poly for the most part, unless the gap is too small, then tape. Never used graphite, but I have spinning rod build coming up using a woven graphite tube handle. Got some graphite arbors to try with the tube. I just sold a rod in the flea mrkt with this kind of grip. I liked it a lot and will do another shortly. The short graphite arbors with the groove worked well. Upon recommendation I placed one for every 2" of grip length, reamed and glued them in place and once set, glued the tube directly to the arbors. Quote
Super User .ghoti. Posted February 17, 2015 Super User Posted February 17, 2015 DVT, I take it that was a Tennessee handle? I would understand the every two inch spacing when you don't know exactly where the reel will be placed. I'm going with the smallest Fuji plate seat for this one, and planned on four arbors; one at the butt, and one placed under each seat wrap. What do you think? Handle will be around ten inches. Quote
Delaware Valley Tackle Posted February 17, 2015 Posted February 17, 2015 You'll be fine .ghoti. The one I referred was indeed a TN handle and consciously erred on the overkill side. Even then, the finished rod weighed only 3.3 oz. I've never fooled with a plate seat but was looking at them the other day. Let me know what you think. Quote
Super User .ghoti. Posted February 17, 2015 Super User Posted February 17, 2015 The rod is for my brother. He's been after my Airrus Tradition spinning rod ever since he first saw it. It has a plate seat. on a large diameter blank. TT did a review on them. Look it up sometime. It's an interesting rod. I wanted to build something for him that resembled, and maybe feels, in hand, like the Airrus. Thanks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.