Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have heard so many arguments about this and I was wondering which you prefer I hear 50 gives you more action and castibality than 65 but 65 gives you some more power. The reason I ask is because I hear so many different things from different people and I have broke off lots of fish and frogs with 30 pound braid not sure why knots were all tied correctly using palamor or double palamor.

  • Global Moderator
Posted

Ummm

I use 30# and have for years and maybe broken off once or twice if I remember right but it was never because of the lb test of the line.

And when I go frogging it is in some of the nastiest stuff you will find in any lake in the country.

Anyway, to answer your question, yes with all things being equal you will get maybe 5yds more distance with 50# over 65#, Maybe.

The 65# wont be as manageable as as the 50# would be but the manageability of braid is not a concern of mine regardless of the presentation I lime it for.

Mike

  • Super User
Posted

I use 65 and frog as one of my primary methods. I have used 50 as well. I can bomb a spro frog on 65 further than I care to fish it. In heavy cover I cannot see as far as I cast. It works for me.

  • Global Moderator
Posted

I mainly use 50 but our vegetation isn't very thick for the most part. 

  • Super User
Posted

No wood to worry about but lots of vegetation, being a spinning user I use 15# braid, strength is not an issue.  I will jump up 20# braid for snakeheads.

Posted

Im making the switch from 65 down to 40

Should get some more casting distance...and 40 is plenty for the lilly pads imo

  • Super User
Posted

I use 50, even in the heaviest, thickest mats we have. Never had trouble pulling them out. One of my biggest fish of 2014, a 6lb 2oz LMB ( A big fish in WNY) came from a mat so thick you could walk on it. Winched her right out with 50lb braid, along with 30lbs of slop.

  • Super User
Posted

Use 30lb myself, might jump to 40.  If you choose to use lighter braids you have to pay attention to your line for frays and wear.  I'm guessing the 30 you broke you have probably fished for a while.  You start seeing frays time to cut that part off.  And since I like using smaller reels in the 100 size, the 30 or 40 will give me more capacity opposed to if I fished 50 or 65lb.  

Posted

I do quite a bit of frog fishing, and the grass in MN is some of the healthiest in the country, I use 50 LB PP. I have had no need to step up to 65 LB because if a pike/muskie cuts through 50 LB it will cut through 65 LB... This last year I started using a leader of 25 lb Big Game when having issues with pike and that reduced the number of pike break-offs tremendously. The thick mono will reduce the ability to walk the frog effectively, but I typically don't walk them anyway. if you don't have to worry about toothy critters I wouldn't ever feel the need to go above 50 LB. 

 

Mitch

  • Like 1
Posted

I've decided on 50 for all but the thickest stuff out there and even then, 65 is probably unecessary. I have 65 rigged on my heaviest Rod for punching and will double it as a frog Rod but rarely.

50 lets you cast so much farther and I find this usually outweighs the benefits of heavier line as I like long casts when using frogs.

Posted

Anyway, to answer your question, yes with all things being equal you will get maybe 5yds more distance with 50# over 65#, Maybe.

Mike

 

I agree 100%, 65 casts plenty far.

  • Super User
Posted

I use and like 50, but have also used (and liked) 30. I think 40 is the happy medium for me the next time I respool.

Posted

50 lb line should be fine. it will cast much farther and will overall handle better

Posted

Pota(e)to ... Pota(a)to IMO. I have used both. :)

 

I use both and have never had an issue with either.  Those are also the only two lb tests of braid I have ever run, so i cannot compare vs some of the other popular tests.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Outboard Engine

    Fishing lures

    fishing forum

    fishing forum

    fishing tackle

    fishing

    fishing

    fishing

    bass fish

    fish for bass



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.