nocellcontracts Posted June 13, 2014 Posted June 13, 2014 Do each of these rods have their own purpose? Or would you guys use the 765 for squarebills and up to 20' divers? Thanks. Quote
Super User MarkH024 Posted June 14, 2014 Super User Posted June 14, 2014 Squarebill is more about accuracy and hitting targets. You'll want the 705. The 765 would be better for long casts with the deep diving cranks. I have a 705cb glass and it is a phenomenal rod. Quote
Super User BrianinMD Posted June 14, 2014 Super User Posted June 14, 2014 I have the 765 for deep cranks and absolutely love it, but would be no way I would throw squarebills on it. Two completely different setups to properly fish them. 1 Quote
DTack Posted June 16, 2014 Posted June 16, 2014 I know a lot of people really don't like using a longer rod for squarebills. I know it can be done with a longer rod, it's all about what you are used to. I have a friend who uses the 805cbrm for all of his crankbaits, deepdivers to squarebills and does quite well with it. If I were going just one rod for both of the baits I would go for the longer of the two. Just personal preference. Quote
nocellcontracts Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 I use to have the 765 (got stolen). When I re-ordered rods, I got the 705 because I thought the 765 was a tad heavy to throw all day. After evaluating the 705....it just feels "weak" in my hand. I throw a Rapala DT6 a LOT. Do you think my casting distance would improve with a DT6 on the 765. I'm thinking i got another 10' or so with it. Quote
DTack Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 I use to have the 765 (got stolen). When I re-ordered rods, I got the 705 because I thought the 765 was a tad heavy to throw all day. After evaluating the 705....it just feels "weak" in my hand. I throw a Rapala DT6 a LOT. Do you think my casting distance would improve with a DT6 on the 765. I'm thinking i got another 10' or so with it. When you say weak do you mean it just doesn't seem to have much power? The glass 705cb can feel that way I think due to the glass. Do you prefer glass rods for cranks over graphite? Did you ever try the 765 on your squarebills? Quote
nocellcontracts Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 Weak - as in casting power. All my rods are 7'3" except for the 705 and the 768 (which feels puny in my hands when throwing spinnerbaits/lipless baits). Quote
DTack Posted June 17, 2014 Posted June 17, 2014 Weak - as in casting power. All my rods are 7'3" except for the 705 and the 768 (which feels puny in my hands when throwing spinnerbaits/lipless baits). I see, did you ever try the 765cb glass for the squarebills? (I think 768 was a type for the 765cb). If you're wanting a bit more beef to your rod you may check out the 805cbrm if you aren't set on a glass rod. Quote
nocellcontracts Posted June 17, 2014 Author Posted June 17, 2014 I'm sorry. I meant to say the 684 rod really feels puny. I got it because many people advised that one over the 7' 3" spinnerbait rod. I mainly fish Neely Henry (the first major lake due south of Guntersville) and I also fish G'ville quite a bit. Both lakes can call for long casts. I did fish a square bill on the 765 when I had it. I can't tell any "load up" difference using that bait between the 705 or the 765. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.