gr8outdoorz Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 Gotta respect this man for his decision. Myself, I would like to think I would C&R, but until put in the situation, you never know. http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/excursions/post/fly-angler-lands-enormous-shark-but-says-trying-for-record-not-worth-killing-the-fish/ Quote
Super User flyfisher Posted March 19, 2014 Super User Posted March 19, 2014 I would C&R this one too...i mean yes he had a record but to me a line class record isn't quite the same thing as the all tackle record. Does anyone know the line class records for largemouth? I know i don't and am not even sure if they exist. Quote
tipptruck1 Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 When I caught my first 5lb plus small mouth. I threw it back. Chances are if I caught a world record fish. I would have no clue what the record is any way. I would just throw it back. I would only take the fish. If I knew it would not survive. There is also a line record for LG mouths. IFGA has a list of freshwater line records. You just have to be a member to see them. Quote
tbone1993 Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 My buddy C&R the record small mouth for our state because he didn't remember the record. He wanted it to spawn and make more big fish as well. Still though a catch like that really does boost the state. Oh well. Quote
Rivers Edge Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 Good for him. I think I would do the same. Quote
Super User J Francho Posted March 19, 2014 Super User Posted March 19, 2014 Let me throw out a devil's advocate viewpoint here. It stands to argue that a record fish has passed it genes on, many times over. That it it got that big is more about that specific fish's circumstances than genetics. If it's a line class record, I'm less likely to keep the fish. A NY State record, largemouth in particular, I'm putting it in ice and getting it weighed immediately. Quote
NathanW Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 Let me throw out a devil's advocate viewpoint here. It stands to argue that a record fish has passed it genes on, many times over. That it it got that big is more about that specific fish's circumstances than genetics. If it's a line class record, I'm less likely to keep the fish. A NY State record, largemouth in particular, I'm putting it in ice and getting it weighed immediately. I completely agree. You would have to be nuts to throw a state record back in the water. Its one oldballs fish who is well beyond her reproductive prime. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.