farmpond1

Biologists (and, more likely, politicians) often cow down to pubic pressure.

This question is obviously directed to those who reside/fish in a different universe than me. Since my largest bass is just over 6 lbs (and I've been fishing for 35 years), I'll just be happy if I remain healthy enough to keep fishing.

That dog has guilty written all over him. He's so cute. If you charged a cat with a similar offense, it would simply look at you like, "Yeah, so what if I did?"

Repeat 3 times quickly: One smart feller, he felt smart Two smart fellers, they both felt smart.

By most deceased peoples standards I'm purty smart.

Hmmm....this is pretty much what I was thinking. Eventually you'll look back on this and wonder why the heck you took it all for granted. Enjoy your time, enjoy your youth, enjoy your health. And fer cryin' out loud, go fishing!

Rather than being nihilistic, saying nothing can be done, and continue to live pigishly or, conversely, adopting a self-loathing attitude believing that humans are parasitic vermin and that we need to voluntarily become instinct, wouldn't it be better to work towards a better future of informed and responsible living. Instead of promoting zero (or negative) population, encourage modest family sizes. Instead of driving a gas guzzling behemoth to work every day, take the bus or drive a modesty sized vehicle. Instead of keeping the thermostat at 75, turn it down to 65 and lower at night. The world could be a better place and it still can be but VHEMTwill not fly with the masses nor, probably, should it.

That would be me.

Yeah, good luck with that. If you marry someone who doesn't "approve" from the git go, she'll still nag you to death about it. Whomever the lucky bride turns out to be-she doesn't have to like fishing so long as she respects you. So be picky and pick wisely.

Derrr...I don't get it. Just kidding. That was a good one! In a similar vein, It's not my fault I'm so pessimistic. My blood type is B negative.

Not working for me either (as of 3 minutes ago).

Depends, who said it blows chunks? Was it a real critic, cause if so then I got to be seeing it. Ain't nothing a critic hates that i have not liked. I got my reviews from Rotten Tomatoes. Critics gave it 32%. Most said it was all action and special effects with no substance. This is generally how i feel about most movies these days. The "audience" gave it a 66%-which is better but not great. Although it would probably be better on the wide screen, I think I'll wait until it comes out on video. Think I'll go see "The King's Speech" instead.

I was so looking forward to seeing a decent Sci Fi film. The special effects looked awesome but now I hear Battle: Los Angeles blows chunks like nearly everything else! Anyone see it?

You didn't pick any shrimp tails outta that ice cream did ya? If so, you might consider changing the beneficiary on your life insurance policy.