A couple of more thoughts on this to initiate discussions...
Is it wise to have a tournament organization run by the tournament anglers? That is akin to the inmates running the asylum. When you have an independent organization running the tournaments, they are pulled in one direction by the anglers, another direction by the sponsors and a third direction by the public. Since the organization has no alliance to any of the 3, but has to please all 3, typically they figure out how to balance that or die. I wonder if MLF will be so focused on making the anglers happy (in order to attract them) that they will end up alienating either the sponsors or the public, making for a quick demise.
All of those Elite anglers really became household names while being Elite anglers (or while on the BASS tours prior to 2006). Even guys like Ehrler & Christie, who were known commodities, jumped up in name recognition after participating successfully in BASS. Since BASS does a good job in taking talented individuals and giving them a platform to make a name for themselves, doesn't it seem logical that 3 or 4 years from now, the current crop of Elites will be as well known as the current crop of Elites?
Is the new MLF format better for the average angler? I personally have enjoyed marshaling in the past, as well as attending Classic takeoffs, expos & weigh-ins free of charge. If the MLF format is aimed at creating a TV product like their Cup series, those experiences will be no longer available. It also seems like this may put a bit of distance between fans & anglers, that the access we currently have to these pros will no longer be available.
Will the MLF format create the same problem some team sports have where guys know they are getting paid, so occasionally they will mail it in? I know Ish Monroe (as an example) believes he should be paid for showing up, regardless of how well or poor he performs. Rare is the individual in sports that people are interested in paying to see just to watch them show up.
I know some folks knock BASS's coverage team, but they are heads and tales above the MLF cup announcers. It is as if there is a coach on the other side of the MLF camera telling each announcer "now, move your hands apart...back together...now apart". How many times are they going to do the same interview about "anything is possible" as they ride to the event? Don't get me wrong, I tape & watch all MLF cup events, but if they are trying to be the top dog, this is an area that needs improvement big time.
If these questions & comments seem to be partisan for BASS, they probably are. I first became a BASS member as a teen back in the 1970's and the organization has done alot of good over the years, not just for tournament anglers, but for everyday anglers. BASS let opportunities slip by as MLF grew, but showed they are willing to change how their tournaments run by doing things like absorbing TexasFest into BASSFest. I know folks are shoveling dirt on BASS, but I am old enough to remember organizations like the WFL who grabbed Czonka & Kiick from the Dolphins (as well as other NFL stars), but didn't have the organizational aptitude to survive more than a couple of years. Remember that MLF never has run a live tournament, something all the talented anglers in the world can't help them with.