Jump to content

jimmyjoe

Super User
  • Posts

    3,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jimmyjoe

  1. jimmyjoe

    1911

    ??? ☠️☠️☠️ ??? ???
  2. We? Have you contributed anything constructive? There are two sorts of people in the world; those who build up and those who tear down. If you cannot be the former, it's still best not to be the latter. jj
  3. O. U. R. so fun-e ? jj
  4. Because of the pandemic, numerous of my e-mails aren't being answered. I understand that perfectly well. I'm going to either call some people or wait until later in the spring, whichever works better. This issue has my curiosity piqued, but I realize it's not a life-and-death situation. I'll get back if (and when) I find out more. jj
  5. If their needles look like the last rod tube that they delivered to me, then NO WAY! ? jj
  6. Okay, that's enough for me. I'm gonna get one. ? THANK YOU, ONE AND ALL! jj
  7. We have two different things under consideration here; 1) the depth of the lure, and 2) the action of the lure. The depth is affected mainly by the diameter of the line and in a minor way by the hydrophilic/hydrophobic quality of the surface finish. The more resistance the line has, the more it "pills up" the lure. The less resistance it has, the more the lure is allowed to fall. Roughly speaking, you're correct about line diameter; lines of the same diameter affect the lure the same. There are two kinds of action; native and non-native. Native action is the action the lure would have if it were entirely free of drag and damping effects; in other words if it were in a perfect environment. For most cranks, this is a side-to-side wiggle, rock or vibration. For spoons, it's usually a wobble. ALL OF THIS CAN BE OVERCOME. Many fishermen tie directly to a crankbait, believing that it's the best way. Sometimes it may be, but sometimes it's not. If the knot is not a loop knot, but tied directly to the tie eye on the lure and pulled tight, and the line is "stiff", the action of the lure can be noticeably impaired. There's nothing wrong with tying directly to a lure, just make sure the lure has an easy range of motion. Some use a loop knot, like a Rapala knot or surgeon's loop, and other use a snap. If you want to know the difference for the lures you use, the solution is easy; get some snaps and try your lures both ways, watching the results carefully. Now ..... a little force can be good. It either enhances the native action of a lure, like pulsing a spinnerbait or twitching a spoon, or it gives action to a lure that has none of its own, like walking a topwater or hopping a tube. That's good, not bad. But it needs to be selective and controlled. So what the fisherman actually does during the retrieve has a lot to do with it. You either cooperate with or fight the action of the lure with your choice of knots, speed and line. Also; if a fisherman retrieves at too high a speed, he defeats the native action of the lure. A fast retrieve can even defeat the design of a diving lip, resulting in a lure that runs far too shallow or that spirals out of control. That's not good. Thankfully, it's also not common. You need a lure that lacks inherent stability for it to happen, and I throw those lures away. Usually, fishermen retrieve lures too fast, although I admit not extremely fast. But slowing down can change the way the lure works .... and get you more fish. Common sense is the rule of the day. Now .... the bad news. All this is the stuff of fine-tuning. It's not stuff that hits you over the head, jumps out of the water or changes lures from what they are to what they're not. You said that it's an analytical person's nightmare, didn't you? It's not .... it's an OVER-analytical person's nightmare. All of these things can be noticed or discovered by the average fisherman under average circumstances, if they just watch carefully. No need to go gonzo. Always remember: You control what you do, what you do doesn't control you. Hope you have more fun fishing, because in the end, fun is what it's all about. ? jj
  8. One other thing that smaller diameter lines does is allow a given lure to exhibit more side-to-side action. This is especially true if you tie on with one of the loop knots. It could have explained the difference in results that he was getting; it wasn't depth, it was action. So overall, your decision may have been made for the wrong reason, but it was the right decision to make. Isn't it funny how things work out? jj
  9. I see what you mean now. All I can tell you is this: There's a pond I fish that has a sunken tree trunk about 25 yards out, about 16 feet deep. If you (or I) drop a lure right on it, the fish will be spooked. So I cast over it as far as I can. My intention? I want to bring a lure right over it, maybe even thunk it, but not snag on it. Last year I went out with (among others) 3 rigs; one had 8 lb. Yo-Zuri, one had 6 lb. Stren, and the last had 4 lb Trilene XL. I was throwing a #3 Aglia, which weighs 1/4 oz. I like it for that particular target because the blade collapses when the lure grazes an object, letting me know exactly where the lure is running. With 4 lb. XL, I snagged. (Grrrrrr.....) With 6 lb. Stren, I just nicked the top of the trunk. Perfect ..... for a while. Eventually, though, I snagged up again. (more Grrrrrr.....) With the 8 lb.Yo-Zuri, I could not get the spinner to hit the tree unless I practically stalled it out. And stalling an Aglia is not easy. How much difference was I seeing? I don't know with any real accuracy, but I would guess a foot to 16 inches between lines at 25 yards. I know this is not a really scientific analysis, but I hope it gives you some ideas. jj
  10. As the dairy farmer said, "You milk'em!" ? ? (Yeah, I know it's corny, but I'm old. I'm allowed to be corny.) jj
  11. 1) It's not test, it's diameter. 8Lb. test Stren Original is .011", but so is 12 lb. test InvizX. 2) It's difficult to actually know what depth you're running. Change the retrieve speed a little, such as cranking from a half-full spool vs. when the spool is almost full at the end, and you make a heck of a lot of difference. The angle of your retrieve makes a difference. So many things could totally swamp the difference between one line and another. 3) If you want maximum depth, use the thinnest braid you think will do the job. 4) If you want minimum depth, run your monofilament line through Crisco, lard or petroleum jelly, and coat it well. This adds resistance going through water. Just don't eat it when you get hungry. ??? jj
  12. I wish that all my crazy ideas were easily attributed to something that simple! ? jj
  13. Simplicity and consistency. Look at the parts breakdown of the Shimano Curado 200K. Then, look at the parts breakdown of a Shimano Cardiff 200A. Same line capacity, but tremendous difference in simplicity. Not only that, but round reels generally have a larger diameter spool. That means that at the end of a 50-yard cast, the remainder of line on your spool is of a larger diameter, too. That helps initial line pickup. The larger diameter spools hold more line, too. Plus .... I learned on them. The Japanese aren't the only ones who appreciate tradition. ? ? jj
  14. Japanese attitudes are that non-subsistence fishing is high-class. Traditionally, reels for larger sport fish were ABU. The market has changed since then, but in Japan, tradition dies with only the greatest of difficulty. Yes, I've used round reels .... since 1963. I love them and hold them in the greatest esteem. (I now have arthritis. It's in the base of my thumbs, which is the absolute worst location for using a round reel.) The rugged reliability of ABU, along with the plethora of parts worldwide both factory and custom, make them interesting to use, modify and collect. The one thing that sets them (and some other round reels) apart from low-profile reels is the synchronized levelwind. Some modern fishermen have a very low opinion of synchro reels that is, in my mind, totally unjustified. I needed a reel the same size as the 5500C3 Abu, and I settled on the Shimano TranX 300a. It's a beast of a reel, yet comfortable for me ..... marginally comfortable, that is. Check around your local markets. You might like it and decide to use it. If not, then the advice given by others (above) will be much more useful to you. jj
  15. If you live in Japan, don't you have easy access to reels that we don't even know about? I'd think prices would be better, too. Surely local Japanese fishermen go after snakehead. Your best tactic is to copy what they use. Whichever decision you make ...................... good luck! jj
  16. I'm sorry, @WRB ; was that a question directed at me, or a possibility directed at the OP? If it was directed at me, the answer is, "I don't know." I bought them form J-Mac in Colona, IL. I doubt that he pours them himself, so I suppose they could be BassTrix. Price seems wrong, though. http://j-maclures.com/muskyswimbait6.aspx jj
  17. Do you mean something like this? They're so-so. jj
  18. Well, I found out that the term I was looking for is, actually, "fracture resistance". That's a quantifiable characteristic of the graphite. The characteristic of the completed structure (in this case a rod) is called "impact resistance". As far as I can see, there's not a lot of info on this subject floating around because advanced forms of graphites and composites are used in the aerospace industries. I took that to mean "defense industries", but I may be wrong. I also saw a report (somewhere) that graphene can improve the fracture resistance of graphite materials, but I'm not sure that the paper had applicability to fishing rods. If that's the case, then some of the really-high-end rods that are being manufactured today with graphene added to them could be the answer to the problem. Considering their price, however, I'll wait for the trickle-down effect to kick in. ? ? ? I called St. Croix yesterday. Understandably, they would not get too specific, but one of the impressions that I took away from our conversation is that the assertion by @spoonplugger1 regarding the importance of the layup of the blank has some merit. I need to get more information about that. One thing seems to be agreed to by all; no graphite construction in popular use can approach the durability and shock resistance of fiberglass. So if I want to save weight, I'm going to have to accept some significant compromises. What degree of compromise and in which area remains to be seen. In that sense, I'm no better off than when I started. ☹️☹️☹️ And the beat goes on ............ jj
  19. I might be interested in a Tatula 150. Maybe, and maybe not. I'd like info from people that have them and use them a lot for me to really decide. I'd use it on a H/M or H/F rod. 1) Any reliability issues? Any noise? 2) Does it seem "strong" if you retrieve heavy (like 1 oz.) spinnerbaits? 3) How does it do with braid? I'll be using 65 lb. braid, of undetermined brand, for frogging. Any problems with braid and that TWS system? I'm kinda leery of Daiwa baitcasters, especially those with the TWS system. To me, it's like it's a "solution in search of a problem", to quote a remark made by a member of this site. I also wonder about the integrity of the TriWing mechanism if I'd pull in a 3 lb. bass with 5 lb. of weeds attached. I don't know how strong it would be under those circumstances. On the other hand, this reel fits perfectly between my Curado 200i and my TranX 300a. I would really like it to work great and be reliable. If it's a great reel, and my fears are unfounded, I think the people here are the best and most reliable way for me to find that out. As always ........ Thnx. jj
  20. I don't know how/where you intend to retrieve your spinnerbait, but I retrieve a heck of a lot on riprap. I literally pull the spinnerbaitrs right over the rocks. Therefore, I use a MH/F or a H/M rod. I figure I need that authority. If you're retrieving with no obstructions, then you don't really need that "authority". jj
  21. I've never found a use for extra-fast actions. Not in Light or Medium Light power, not in Medium and not in MH or Heavy power. Don't like'em, and don't use'em. jj
  22. This article might clear things up. https://marklassagne.com/bass-fishing-articles/fishing-rods-the-confusing-difference/ Notice Young's modulus of IM6 (40M or million) and the modulus of S-fiberglass (only 12 million). This paper from Toray (Tokyo Rayon) has a little more information. However, I'm not sure how useful it is. They don't cross-reference the Hexcel terminology. https://www.toraycma.com/page.php?id=661 This entry (4th post) adds the confusion of "ton" https://www.stripersonline.com/surftalk/topic/655750-how-to-interpret-blanks-specs-like-imx-24t30t-tc2tc3-etc/ These different articles reference IM6 as variously 33, 36 and 40 million Young's modulus. With inconsistencies like this, no wonder there's so much confusion! Add to this the fact that the Young's modulus of a material has almost no bearing on the quality and characteristics of the product in which it is used, and you can see why you really need to find a manufacturer that you know and trust and simply stick with them. However ..... I'm still wondering about brittleness. I don't know where different rods stand in light of this problem. What's the term to describe resistance to fracture, anyway? Is it simply "toughness"? jj
  23. Eat. Take long naps. Eat some more. Tell doctor that I can't understand why I'm gaining weight. ??? jj
  24. He probably made a typo. I'd think that he meant 25M, for "million modulus". jj
  25. Try Fenwick Eagle. Because they're transitioning at this time of year, I don't know what you can find, but I know they have (or had) 2-pc. casting rods. jj
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.