Got you, I was thinking of someone with outdoor space.
I went out this morning to try them out. Both are pretty hard for me to cast with any real accuracy, but after an hour or so I could at least hit a weed line at 40-50'. The 68 has an amazing action on a super slow retrieve, I really wish I had made it out to this spot within a few days of the last trout stocking. It runs through sparse pads very well, but I think less expensive lure like a RI Big Dipper might be a more practical option for that presentation. I think it's real value is going to be running open areas, once I get more skilled in casting it. I didn't get any attention from fish on it, but had a rather large turtle follow it for a few retrieves. I have a bad feeling that this lure is going to meet it's end to a snapper.
The gill was less impressive at first, with little action at low speed and only a very subtle one at a quick retrieve. But after running it through a group of actual gills and scattering them, it does like very very much like a scared gill just hauling butt away. It also skips very well and I quickly improved my close range accuracy with it. It seems much less weedless then the 68, both the actual hook and the more prominent fins. I think this one will see more use than the 68, as sunfish of that size are very common in most of the spots I fish. Because I use my frog rod to throw these, I am going to need to get a second spool so I can swap out while fishing. I can see carrying it to use when I find a spot of clear water in the summer while out frogging.
Now I just need to think up a way to carry them when hiking. I can only carry a single 3600 box in my pack, and that gill is big. I am thinking something like a thick and semi rigid plastic envelope maybe?