In my experience with most grades of guides with braid, which is tougher on guides than mono or FC, it is rare for any guide to groove. But it is not rare for tiptops to groove, which is why I always use SIC, Alconite, or zirconium for tiptops. I would use all SIC, but in some cases you cannot get the model, finish, or size that you want in SIC.
One aspect not yet explained is that the lighter the guides on a rod, especially on the tip, the more sensitive the rod will be. It is not that some materials are more sensitive than others, it's simply that lighter means more sensitive. Period. It happens that many of the lighter materials are more expensive, like titanium used in frames. You've probably seen micro guides, guides that have inner ring diameters of a few millimeters. The reason for this is twofold. First, small is light, so they are good for sensitivity. Second, some believe that with the right height of guide, and a very small ID, the line gets controlled quicker and casts farther.
Also, not all titanium guides are created equal. While Fujis and Alps are just about indestructible, there is a brand whose titanium A frame spin guides are almost fragile.
Interestingly, you can sink well over a hundred dollars in a full set of spinning guides, Fuji Torzite to be exact. Are they that much better than the more normal ~ $50 for a set of titanium Alconites? I personally don't think so.
Another interesting thing is that most factory rods have a lot of sizes of guides, getting progressively smaller as you go out to the tip. It has been found that that is not the best setup for guides for weight (sensitivity) or casting distance. The best way is to have only about 3 guides getting progressively smaller, (spinning rod) then have the rest of the guides the same, small , size out to the end, Why do factories keep doing it in a less efficient way? Because they feel that customers expect the guide train to look like that and would not as likely buy what might be counterintuitive to some.