Jump to content

dodgeguy

Super User
  • Posts

    4,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by dodgeguy

  1. he's the only major pro i know off.there are a few i know who fish local tournaments around me.it's just a matter of if they want to get involved or not.i know they have no problem being accepted by other fishermen that i fish with.
  2. i use 10 inch worms a lot in the summer.a 7 inch will usually catch more fish.
  3. my favorite technique would be spinnerbaiting.
  4. technically you are correct.but i know plenty of guys who have adapted it to heavier cover fishing.it's great for dropping in holes in weedbeds.this requires heavier line.i also know guys who dropshot in weedbeds with braid with great success.the key is to stay open minded.this could save the day when nothing else works.
  5. i have fished it on 65 lb suffix braid and caught fish on it. this year i am fishing it on 12 lb cajun red cast on a 6-6 mh bass pro shops extreme spinning rod with a pflueger 6040 spinning reel.i fish in heavy cover and have used cajun red cast in heavy cover fishing worms with no problems.the reason i'm switching back to red cast is last year i used braid and the year before i used red cast.i didn't realize it until i totaled my fish caught (i keep a record of every fish and conditions) and found that i caught twice as many fish on red cast compared to braid.
  6. i have to dissagree.i would buy the president because i feel centrifugal brakes are better.just start with all 6 in the on position.either that or get a supreme which has both.then start with 4 centrifugal on and add a little bit of magnets with the dial as needed.
  7. start with a really limp line like braid or cajun red cast or trilene xl.the limper the line the less you will backlash.
  8. red only looks like blood in shallow water.as you go down it turns grey.since water has less light the deeper you go it starts to camoflage itself into the darker murkier water.this happens slower in clear water and faster in stained water.it doesn't dissapear it changes color and camoflages the line.it's the same concept as hunting with camo.the hunter didn't dissapear you just can't pick him out as easy. http://www.bassresource.com/bass_fishing_forums/YaBB.pl?num=1166499354
  9. if it is digging into the spool this is possible.braid should be used in the same diameter as you would use a mono.this helps prevent digging in.also try sufix braid.imho it is superior to all others and diggs less.i use 16/65 on a baitcaster and would not go below 12/50.
  10. you got it dude!!!MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!
  11. yes,i think the red lightning stinks.it's basically a saltwater trolling line and is stiff as wire.i think the red cast is the best mono line i have ever used imho.i have not tried cajun advantage so i cannot comment on it.last year i used all braid.this year most of my rods are going back to cajun red cast.2 years ago i used red cast and caught twice as many fish per my records as i did with straight braid this year.this kind of upset me because i love braid and how sensitive it is.
  12. 6040 medalist is 30 inches of line recovery.
  13. i am a pflueger fan i i would have told you not to buy a president spinning reel because it is a graphite frame.the supreme casting reel is a different story.did you send them back for warranty repair?if so what happened?all reel manufacturers have to make warranty repairs.
  14. I don't knock shimano and diawa because they make good products. I do think they cost to much but that's my opnion.
  15. the 8040 magnesium supreme is going to be $100 9.6 oz. coming out in march 2007 the aluminum 6040 medalist is $79 and saltwater rated and 13.2 oz. they make a medalist all the way up to a 6080 size for saltwater. 6080 240yds./25# 4.3:1 27.2 oz. H/SW i have a medalist 6040 and imho it is the best spinning reel i have ever owned.i've owned shimano stradics and various diawa reels along with other brands.
  16. i just bought one the other day to replace a rod i busted 6 inches off the tip.got a 6-6- mh spinning rod 1 piece.everyone i know who owns them likes them.
  17. add a few $ and get a medalist.
  18. it's legal in flw and not in bass.i think bass tried it for 1 year and stopped.
  19. absorbing shock without breaking doesn't mean it has to stretch like a rubberband.you post up opinions all the time without a shread of proof.at least this study was done with a total explanation of how it was done and how the conclusions were drawn.if you want to dispute the conclusions then do a study and post it.
  20. this article proves it does not have a lot of stretch for a mono line. http://pages.videotron.com/fishing/estretch.htm
  21. you post all this stuff up but yet never offer any proof.if you are actually correct it would be nice to see the proof.i do know they share some parts with silstar/pinnacle but then again chrysler/ford /gm use some of the same parts also.
  22. http://www.basspro.com/servlet/catalog.TextId?hvarTextId=74494&hvarDept=100&hvarEvent=&hvarClassCode=1&hvarSubCode=1&hvarTarget=browse http://www.basspro.com/servlet/catalog.TextId?hvarTextId=51667&hvarDept=100&hvarEvent=&hvarClassCode=1&hvarSubCode=1&hvarTarget=browse http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/product/standard-item.jsp?_DARGS=/cabelas/en/common/catalog/item-link.jsp_A&_DAV=MainCatcat20166-cat20331&id=0042281121538a&navCount=1&podId=0042281&parentId=cat20331&masterpathid=&navAction=push&catalogCode=2UG&rid=&parentType=index&indexId=cat20331&hasJS=true
  23. from what i have read big game has less stretch than either of the other 2.xl is stretchy and limp and good on spinning rods.big game is underated and generally breaks way above it's rated pound test.big game stinks on spinning.it's great on casting rods.it's highly abrasion resistant.i used it for 2 seasons and liked it.i am considering going back to it because it is less visible than braid.
  24. http://library.thinkquest.org/28170/35.html Visibility under water depends on the amount of light reaching the particular depth. Illumination itself depends on the thickness of the layer, on the reflection and scatter of light rays in the water medium. 18% of them reach a depth of 18m and some 1% reach as deep as 100m. Besides this fact, a part of the coming from the sun is reflected by the surface of the water. The amount of reflected light depends on the angle between the rays and the surface of the water, also, on the quantity of air bubbles in the surface layer that have been formed by the motion of the water. The most important reason for the low visibility under water is the weakening of the refraction capability of human eyes. In the open air, it is sufficient because the refraction quotient of light is 1 and hat of the human optical system is 1.38. Water has a refraction quotient of 1.33, that is, close to that of the eyes. In this case, light is only slightly refracted and the image is formed far beyond the retina, corresponding to long-sightedness of 20 diopters. The function of the mask is to provide normal conditions for underwater visibility by introducing a layer of air with a quotient of 1. Contact lenses can be used instead of a mask. They must have, however, a refraction quotient greater than 1.4 to ensure normal vision under water. To function effectively under water, divers must understand the changes that occur in their visual perception under water. Many of these changes are caused simply by the fact that light, the stimulus for vision, travels through water rather than air; consequently it is refracted, absorbed, and scattered differently than in air. Refraction, absorption, and scatter all follow physical laws and their effects on light can be predicted; this changed physical stimulus can in turn have pronounced effects on our perception of the underwater world. Refraction In refraction, the light rays are bent as they pass from one medium to another of different density. In diving, the refraction occurs at the interface between the air in the diver's mask and the water. The refracted image of an underwater object is magnified, appears larger than the real image, and seems to be positioned at a point three-fourths of the actual distance between the object and the diver's faceplate. This displacement of the optical image might be expected to cause objects to appear closer to the diver than they actually are and, under some conditions, objects do indeed appear to be located at a point three- fourths of their actual distance from the diver. This distortion interferes with hand-eye coordination and accounts for the difficulty often experienced by novice divers attempting to grasp objects under water. At greater distances, however, this phenomenon may reverse itself, with distant objects appearing farther away than they actually are. The clarity of the water has a profound influence on judgments of depth: the more turbid the water, the shorter the distance at which the reversal from underestimation to overestimation occurs. For example, in highly turbid water, the distance of objects at 3 or 4 feet (0.9 or 1.2 m) may be overestimated; in moderately turbid water, the change might occur at 20 to 25 feet (6.1 to 7.6 m); and in very clear water, objects as far away as 50 to 75 feet (15.2 to 22.9 m) might be underestimated. It is important for the diver to realize that judgments of depth and distance are probably inaccurate. As a rough rule of thumb, the closer the object, the more likely it will appear too close, and the more turbid the water, the greater the tendency to see it as too far away. Training to overcome inaccurate distance judgments can be effective, but it is important that it be carried out in water similar to that of the proposed dive or in a variety of different types of water. In addition, training must be repeated periodically to be effective. Changes in the optical image result in a number of other distortions in visual perception. Mistakes in estimates of size and shape occur. In general, objects under water appear to be larger by about 33 percent than they actually are. This often is a cause of disappointment to sport divers, who find, after bringing catches to the surface, that they are smaller than they appeared under water. Since refraction effects are greater for objects off to the side of the field of view, distortion in the perceived shape of objects is frequent. Similarly, the perception of speed can be influenced by these distortions; if an object appears to cross the field of view, its speed will be increased because of the greater apparent distance it travels. These errors in visual perception and misinterpretations of size, distance, shape, and speed caused by refraction can be overcome, to some extent, with experience and training. In general, experienced divers make fewer errors in judging the underwater world than do novice divers. However, almost all divers are influenced to some extent by the optical image, and attempts to train them to respond more accurately have met with some, but not complete, success. Although the refraction that occurs between the water and the air in the diver's face mask produces these undesirable effects, air itself is essential for vision. For example, if the face mask is lost, the diver's eyes are immersed in water, which has about the same refrac- tive index as the eyes. Consequently, no normal focus- ing of light occurs and the diver's vision is impaired immensely. The major deterioration is in visual acuity; other visual functions such as the perception of size and distance are not degraded as long as the object can be seen. The loss of acuity, however, is dramatic, and acuity may fall to a level that would be classified as legally blind (generally 20/200) on the surface. While myopes (near-sighted individuals) do not suffer quite as much loss in acuity if their face masks are lost as individuals with 20/20 vision do, the average acuities of the two groups, myopes and normals, were found to be 20/2372 and 20/4396, respectively, in one study of underwater acuity without a mask. Scatter Scatter occurs when individual photons of light are deflected or diverted when they encounter suspended particles in the water. Although scattering also occurs in air, it is of much greater concern under water because light is diffused and scattered by the water molecules themselves, by all kinds of particulate matter held in suspension in the water, and by transparent biological organisms. Normally, scatter interferes with vision and underwater photography because it reduces the contrast between the object and its background. This loss of contrast is the major reason why vision is so much more restricted in water than in air (Duntley 1963, Jerlov 1976); it also accounts for the fact that even large objects can be invisible at short viewing distances. In addition, acuity or perception of small details is generally much poorer in water than in air, despite the fact that the optical image of an object under water is magnified by refraction (Baddeley 1968). The deterioration increases greatly with the distance the light travels through the water, largely because the image-forming light is further interfered with as it passes through the nearly transparent bodies of the biomass, which is composed of organisms ranging from bacteria to jellyfish. Absorption Light is absorbed as it passes through the water, and much of it is lost in the process. In addition, the spectral components of light, the wavelengths that give rise to our perception of color, are differentially absorbed. Transmission of light through air does not appreciably change its spectral composition, but transmitting light through water, even through the clearest water, does, and this can change the resulting color appearance beyond recognition. In clearest water, long wavelength or red light is lost first, being absorbed at relatively shallow depths. Orange is filtered out next, followed by yellow, green, and then blue. Other waters, particularly coastal waters, contain silt, decomposing plant and animal material, and plankton and a variety of possible pollutants, which add their specific absorptions to that of the water. Plankton, for example, absorb violets and blues, the colors transmitted best by clear water. The amount of material suspended in some harbor water is frequently sufficient to alter the transmission curve completely; not only is very little light transmitted, but the long wavelengths may be transmitted better than the short, a complete reversal of the situation in clear water. Changes occur too in the appearance of colors under water. For example, red objects frequently appear black under water.
  25. once again.red hooks turn grey underwater unless in shallow water.red lures turn grey in deep water.red hooks are only red in shallow water..the line is translucent so it greys out quicker than a red hook.this makes it blend into the surrounding area not dissapear.it's like a guy wearing camo.he's still there but you can't see him because the camo makes him blend in.he hasn't dissapeared literally.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.