As I have watched the latest MLF Challenge cup on TV over the past few weeks, I have wondered how long will B.A.S.S. (& F.L.W.) will continue their current format of bringing fish in to be weighed and then releasing them. When Catch & Release was first instituted in B.A.S.S. tourneys in the early 70's, it was a major change. It shook up how tournaments were run and how anglers had to handle their catch. I was reading about the upcoming Elite series tournament on the Sacramento River and it appears they will be returning fish to the basic areas where they were caught (i.e., delta fish back to the delta, river fish back to the river). That is alot of work & logistics, a far cry from the time when they were all just dumped off the local marina dock.
Now I don't believe B.A.S.S. tournaments will adapt the MLF scoring system, it changes their history too much and eliminates the hype & anticipation of a weigh-in ceremony. MLF are made for TV contests while the B.A.S.S. tournaments do well with an audience. What I anticipate is a hybrid between the two, with fish being documented when caught & then released immediately and an in person ceremony that shows the results. If I suddenly replaced Jerry McKinnis, here is how I would do it:
Every legal fish caught by an angler (that he chooses to weigh) is weighed by the angler & the marshal using identically calibrated scales distributed by B.A.S.S. The angler is responsible for getting the fish securely locked on to the scale & removing it, the marshal is responsible for a fair weighing. The scales transmit the weight of the fish, time of catch and type of bass (may need to be input) back to the tournament headquarters & the data is stored in the weighing device. As a backup, the marshal can manually record the information. I think it may be a positive if the angler is not told the official weight of each fish. Once weighed, the fish is immediately released in clear view of the marshal. The weigh-in ceremony is conducted as it is now, except instead of a bag of fish, the angler comes to the scales with his weigh-in device. At the weigh-in line, each anglers weigh-in device is connected to the scoring computer, which checks the data against that which had been transmitted. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the marshals backup records are used to resolve it (the marshals records can also be used to confirm that both sets of data are correct). When an angler is called to the stage, his weigh-in device is connected to the scoreboard. Drama can be added by having the scoreboard reveal information in a delayed manner. Maybe the first thing shown is the number of fish the angler caught, then a listing of the times the top five were caught, followed by the weight of the top five. The idea would be to keep the anticipation of "who is going to win" there without the fish being there.
One of the first things I thought of when this popped into my head is how likely is it for an angler to catch the same fish multiple times in the same day or tournament. This and other issues could be resolved, most likely through some new technology, but it would bring a whole new skill set into play. If you could get the same 10 lb bedding female to bite 2,3,4 times in an 8 hr day, that would be amazing.
What are your thoughts on this?