Here is some related text I found (it's a section of the CA Drought Bill):
"(e) Reducing Predator Habitat.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Commerce shall implement a pilot program—
A: to identify natural and artificial factors in the Sacramento River and the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta watershed that could be providing favorable predatory fish habitat for fish that prey on juvenile salmon;
B: to collect scientific data at those locations to determine whether those natural or artificial factors are contributing to predation of endangered fish; and
C: to provide recommendations on whether those natural or artificial factors that enable the formation or continuation of predatory fish habitat could be feasibly and effectively modified, in compliance with all applicable State and Federal laws (including regulations), to reduce predation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The pilot projects shall—
A: seek to reduce invasive aquatic vegetation, predators, and other competitors which contribute to the decline of native listed pelagic and anadromous species that occupy the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay-Delta; and
B: remove, reduce, or control the effects of species, including Asiatic clams, silversides, gobies, Brazilian water weed, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, striped bass, crappie, bluegill, white and channel catfish, and brown bullheads."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm guessing this part is where the regulations will come in? Interesting that habitat destruction is also included...Likely include killing off aquatic vegetation. Makes it even worse.
This isn't just a CA bill, it looks like it's a US Senate bill. BUT, it still shows as being in committee as of 10/8, so it hasn't passed yet unless I'm missing something. There is still an opportunity for amendments or to vote it down. It also needs to pass the House of Reps which means anglers should familiarize themselves with how to contact their Senators and Reps (if they don't already know). This all assuming I've been looking at the same thing Tom is referencing.
If it's true, I'm sure bass fisherman will 'accidentally' drop the fish back in the water...But I can imagine it will cause problems for tournaments since it likely also prohibits transporting the fish alive, so you can't put them in your livewell. I have many more thoughts on the subject but most would violate BR's 'no-politics' policy so I will keep them to myself...Other than to say I strongly oppose these regulations/laws.