I've got three Koppers lures and have caught several fish on them when other crankbaits/topwaters weren't getting the job done. The wakebait usually gets hit when its paused after a couple of cranks so the fish are getting a good look at it, it's not whizzing by them. The pro extolling the virtues of the Wakebait in iCast '10 video said to burn it for best results, that certainly doesn't work for me all year.
I usually get bites on the Koppers crankbait lures within the first few casts. Now maybe the fish magically show up the second I tie them on, or maybe they have a quality that causes fish to bite that other lures don't. They have a more realistic paint job and a tighter "wiggle" than the action of my other crankbaits. I do not own any of Kenneth's lures so can't compare the two.
To the guy that wrote: "Now koppers "designs" this revolutionary idea that is an absolute dead ringer to his", get your eyes checked, these two baits aren't even close. If you have to use such ridiculously wrong statements to prove a point, you don't have any credibility. Koppers claims to have had this lure in development for four years, from what I've seen Kenneth write on other sites, he created his in 2012 more as a novelty than a serious concept.
