Man, this man and I must be mind twins, cuz the more I read what he writes the more I see he thinks like me.
Ok, let me add a little bit more salt grains. What I see is this tendency of many of the posters here is that emphasis they put on baits, the bait is a tool and it don 't perform miracles, you may have hundreds of baits ( like me ) but, like I said before: Learn to know your baits and learn to know your prey.
Know your baits means know how each of them works, what are it 's strong points, what are their weak points and so forth, why ? cuz you gotta choose the right tool to do the right task. But the point is that the right task depends on where you are going to fish it and trhat depends on ----> LOCATION
What I see, is this lacking of "situational awareness", it 's been said that 90% of the fish is in 10% of the water, problem is that most of the times you don 't know how to locate that 10 percent of the water that holds 90% of the fish because you don 't look with an analytical eye the surroundings, you are just there and what you see doesn 't tell you anything at all, you look and you don 't see.
Let 's put an example, an example I 've used many times in this forum:
In my neck of the woods certain tree species only grow in certain places. Willows in my neck of the woods only grow in wild form where the soil is moist year round and in the semidesertic climate I live that only happens in most cases either near a river or a creek channel.
So when I go to a lake built on my countryside the first thing I look for are drowned willow trees because I know that:
1.- The river creek channel which is structural feature is right at the feet of those trees or not far away, it means that I can expect a change not only in the contour but also a change in the depth.
2.- The river or creek channel has a different botttom composition and for what I know and have seen that bottom composition will be a mix of sand, crushed rock and boulders which will not be present above the river/creek channel.
So we have underwater: a drop, the river/creek bed, sudden change in depth, bottom composition depth, it doesn 't matter if it 's 10 ft deep or 30 ft deep, those elements will be there.
Now let 's put another example, weeds, we don 't normally see weeds like lily pads in my neck of the woods, what we see is hornwort, elodea, hydrilla. I know that those aquatic plants can only grow as deep and the light penetrates, if the bottom contour was all flat then the weeds would cover it like a carpet, but also I know that those plants can only grow not only under ceratin circumstances of light penetration but also, they only grow where the bottom composition they prefer. Any change in the bottom composition or on the depth will cause the weeds to grow stunted or not grow at all. You see a weedbed, I study the weedbed looking for irregularities in the weed growth, because those irregularities tell me that there 's something different undernearth and that soemthing different is what I 'm looking for, a change in the structure or the structural elements because I know those changes attract the fish to it.
Study the terrain above water level, what 's above water level is most likely to continue underwater, if it looks interesting above water level then it 's interesting underwater.