Yes, this fight should have happened many years ago, and it seems everyone is in agreement that Mayweather waited to increase his chances of winning. Consider this. Mayweather fights De La Hoya, and wins by a split decision. Some people think De La Hoya won, but I feel Mayweather probably deserved that one. Pac-man fights the same fighter a year-and-a-half later and decimates him and forces De La Hoya into retirement. This is when the fight should have happened - roughly 2009. Both fighters were in their prime, and the Pac-man probably could have beat Mayweather at that time. If the Pac-man can open up and catch Mayweather, he can win. Two fights to look at: Watch how a past-his-prime Sugar Shane Mosley caught Mayweather and almost knocked him down. This is the closest anyone has come to knocking him out and it came in toe-to-toe fighting. Also, watch the first Mayweather/Jose Luis Castillo fight - another scrapfest. Many people think Castillo won, and I do too. Mayweather got very lucky with a decision in that fight. He also had troubles with Zab Judah and Emanuel Augustus - both quirky fighters. The point of all this is I believe Mayweather is very beatable by the right person. Perhaps Pac-man can put pressure like Maidana did in his first fight v. Mayweather, and somehow model what Mosley and Castillo did, and add some south-paw quirkiness. I know, its asking a lot - but f he can do it I think its a win. But if Mayweather is allowed to bike around the ring all night, its going to be a boring decision in Mayweather's favor. Ahhh, do we have to wait until May?