I agree my GTO would smoke any stock Mach 1, GT and most modded GT's. The only thing Ford made worth anything in 03-04 was the Terminators...
What year is your GTO? Those newer ones not 2010 new but like 04s or w/e they had were a disgrace to GTO's that were made back in the day. I have a hard time believing you SMOKE mach 1s. I just looked up the manual 2010 GTO will run 13.8s in the quarter mile and the 2004 Mach 1s will run 13.2s. Not saying these are true of what you can do or someone better could do in the GTO but I'm saying the mach 1 driver would have to suck at driving for you to "smoke" him.
come on, anyone that knows anythign about cars knows you can't compare magazine 1/4 mile times and call it a day. 13.8 in a 6.0 GTO is a pretty crappy time. I know a guy with just headers running low 12's in a manual 6.0. Majority of good drivers are somewhere in the low 13 range, and some people have hit 12's bone stock.
Also, to your other post, you have to look at WEIGHT as well as hp. Power to weight ratio is more important than hp, as well as looking at the full power band. If a car makes 30 more peak whp, but the rest of the power band the other car has the advantage, that 30 peak means nothing. This is why a car like a lotus with 185-210 hp blows away cars with double the power.
Anyone that knows ANYTHING about cars knows that the gto is not at all what it should be. It's pretty sad that it runs lows 13s maybe 12s stock. When a mach 1 runs low 13s stock. It all depends on the driver which anyone that knows ANYTHING about cars know. You "SMOKING" Mach 1 might be true if your racing 16 year olds with daddys car. You know that, and I know that. The terminator is an 04 that can hit twelves in WELL under 30k. The newer GTOs are NOT a big deal. Anyone that knows ANYTHING about cars obviously know weight makes a difference. Which is why civics and ricers think they're the shht. Point is, your "gto" is not a bad . machine. Sorry!
Please show me where someone bought a brand new Terminator for under 30 grand... I beg you! lol, in your last post you said something about the GT500 being so overprice its not even funny, well what do you think the Terminators were back in 03-04???? Let me tell you, they were overpriced... Come on man, just do a little research before you start posting nonsense...
The Mach 1 maybe a nice car, but to me its just a re badged mustang with a little more horse power... I mean come on Ford had to put forced induction to keep up with Chevy, Pontiac, and Dodge. You also said "beating a Mach 1 might be true if your racing 16 year olds with daddys car". To tell you the truth I think my sister can beat a Mach 1 giving her about a week to practice.
You also said ANYBODY that knows ANYTHING about cars obviously know weight/hp makes a difference. Thats why Ford decided to put a 305hp/320ft tq in a car that weighs 3465lbs, and Pontiac decided to put 400hp/400ft tq in a 3700 lbs car. Also to help you out 1 tenth of a second equals 1 car length at the track. So if we were magazine racing your Mach 1 would be down 4 cars to the GTO, and WS6...