Ok enough of that silliness here some links to different videos,
1. the unknown primate dna, the Dr's name is Kurt Nelson from the University of Minnesota, the evidence comes from the Snelgrove Lake area in Ontario Canada, the footage that deals with this specifically comes in around a minute 30 seconds http://www.history.c...g-for-sasquatch
2. The Snookum Cast which is interesting, this supposedly shows the body inprint of a Sasquatch, looks like a mess to me, but the biolgists have some interesting things to say about unknown primates, and why this inprint did not come from an elk or other animals in the area. http://www.history.c...testing-bigfoot
3. Of course what bigfoot discussion would be complete without the Patterson Footage. This is not the link I wanted to provide where they discuss the muscular definition and the soft tissue injury evident on the beast in the film. But it is a short discussion of the film and it is the full footage not the shortened one people have seen, oh and btw they examine the original 16mm film not a copy of it http://www.history.c...igfoot-evidence
4.This is one of the National Geographic documentaries it is very long and I didn't review it, it does feature Dr. Jeff Meldrum an anthropologist from the Idaho State University and a recognized expert in the evolution of bipedalism, and other professionals and I'm sure a couple of quacks thrown in too. I'm not sure if this is the one with the forensic scientist talking about the dermal ridges or not, this video mentions 15 different dna sequences that can not be attributed to any known animal yet show primate sequencing, but it is not considered conclusive proof because there is no body of a bigfoot to compare it to. They also answer the questions concerning bones and fossils, why there are none. Did you know there are no chimpanzee bones or fossils? Just providing the link. http://channel.natio...behind-bigfoot/
I managed to find an article from Nat Geo that validates the dermal ridge, also documents the statements by Jane Goodall will provide quote and link.
Now, Bigfoot advocates are increasingly turning to forensic evidence to prove the existence of the giant creature.
Investigator Jimmy Chilcutt of the Conroe Police Department in Texas, who specializes in finger- and footprints, has analyzed the more than 150 casts of Bigfoot prints that Meldrum, the Idaho State professor, keeps in a laboratory.
Chilcutt says one footprint found in 1987 in Walla Walla in Washington State has convinced him that Bigfoot is real.
"The ridge flow pattern and the texture was completely different from anything I've ever seen," he said. "It certainly wasn't human, and of no known primate that I've examined. The print ridges flowed lengthwise along the foot, unlike human prints, which flow across. The texture of the ridges was about twice the thickness of a human, which indicated that this animal has a real thick skin."
Meldrum, meanwhile, says a 400-pound (180-kilogram) block of plaster known as the Skookum Cast provides further evidence of Bigfoot's existence. The cast was made in September 2000 from an impression of a large animal that had apparently lain down on its side to retrieve some fruit next to a mud hole in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest in Washington State.
Meldrum says the cast contains recognizable impressions of a forearm, a thigh, buttocks, an Achilles tendon and heel. "It's 40 to 50 percent bigger than a normal human," he said. "The anatomy doesn't jive with any known animal."
A few academics believe Meldrum could be right.
Renowned chimpanzee researcher Jane Goodall last year surprised an interviewer from National Public Radio when she said she was sure that large, undiscovered primates, such as the Yeti or Sasquatch, exist.
taken from article at Nat Geo http://news.national..._bigfoot_2.html
I wish I could find the other show from Nat Geo with the dermal ridges that was facinating, but anyway there is evidence of something bipedal, what it is has yet to be resolved.
Now here is a question for ya, do I really believe or have I just adopted the Devil's advocate role??? I will confess that I'm not a member of the bigfoot community or any cryptozoological community/group