Jump to content

Team9nine

Super User
  • Posts

    6,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by Team9nine

  1. Wind is good, but after hitting the ponds pretty consistently all winter and spring, I'm starting to see that water clarity trumps wind, at least on my waters. A good stain after some rain has provided much better fishing in comparison than wind and clearer water. North end south end has been somewhat of a toss up as layout and depths sometimes make it difficult to tease out real effect in a small body of water. YMMV
  2. Skeet pays a driver to haul his rig around to events. He flies in and out of places as necessary (home, sponsor appearances, etc.).
  3. Just changed out a couple reels this winter that had Toray fluoro on them after 3 full seasons of use, but they were both 16lb. Super Hard, so they're naturally a little stiffer than lighter test finesse line and probably needed the change.
  4. Another vote for Junebug as the better all-around soft plastic color of the two. Just seems to work in a wider variety of water clarities, plus it's a more standardized color combination across all companies. You see a lot more variation in black/blue patterns and coloring between companies, to the point I won't use/buy some of them because they just don't seem right to me.
  5. For spinning outfits, finesse or otherwise, I use a leader most times for a variety of reasons, but 'visibility' is furthest down that list.
  6. Sounds like a neat place. I'd go in expecting good things to happen until the fishing proves otherwise
  7. It's supposed to be, or at least believed to be, but I've seen some independent testing that suggests that's not always the case. Generally leader material is expected to be bit stiffer with better abrasion resistance. Personally, I don't bother with it, but can understand why some do.
  8. Obviously depends on a lot of variables, but in general, warm rains in the spring are usually a good thing which will get shallow fish biting, even if temporary. Warming water temps will boost up metabolism, and if coupled with some stained water (not mud), create a positive bite window. May not affect deeper fish much though unless accompanied by some strong winds that mix the water well.
  9. I honestly have no idea since I don't throw Chatterbaits much. I thought they'd be a "flash in the pan" bait that bass became accustomed to rather quickly due to their strong vibration pattern, but I was obviously wrong in that regard. I know a lot of guys who use them effectively, but it seems like there would be situations where one would be better than the other in certain situations, e.g., cranks deflect better, but chatters have more vibration in general, etc.
  10. Because in Oct. 2005, the date of the post you quoted, almost nobody had heard of a Chatterbait. It was introduced in 2004 and only sold ~5,000 lures nationwide. It didn't "take off" until Thrift won a Stren Series event on Okeechobee in Jan. 2006 with it, followed up by 8 of the top 10 anglers in the FLW opener on the same lake that same month using it.
  11. No scanning, just fish. Midwest Finesse was developed on flatland impoundments where bass are the dominant predator. Ask a biologist how many times they electrofish down a bank in those type of waters and don't shock up bass. The answer will be "almost never."
  12. Yes Bass anglers love having something to throw at whether that be lay downs, bushes, weedbeds, docks, etc. As such, banks with lots of "cover" tend to attract a lot of fishing pressure, whereas banks that aren't littered with objects/cover like swimming beaches, the dam face, bank transitions, mud/clay banks, etc. don't usually get near as much pressure. These are the types of banks "nothing looking" refers to. The kind that if you were running down the lake and looked over at, you probably normally wouldn't take the time to stop and fish. This also works well because these featureless banks are well suited to an open hook (jighead) presentation on lighter line.
  13. So I did some searching and it turns out I think we're both right in some regards . Here's the best explanation I found over on the rodbuilding site to a question specifically dealing with the issue. Someone also pointed out that the tip top acts as a "wiper" for the line and thereby receives the majority of the "gunk" built up from off the line, leading to the most abrasion.
  14. Can't say for certain the exact reason, but I don't abuse my rods, have only ever had to replace tips on spinning outfits (never casting), and I almost exclusively use braid on them, almost never use it on casting rods. Could be coincidence, but that seems awefully unlikely given the number of times this has occurred, combined with about twice the number of casting rods vs spinning, and many more older casting rods still in service without a hitch. I'd also add that the tip can't go where the line doesn't take it first. Seems like in practical use it would take the brunt of the wear from the line whether playing fish or simply retrieving under pressure unless you just always pointed your rod straight at the bait or fish.
  15. Only the tip tops where all the pressure is focused. I've had to have them replaced on half a dozen rods now from the effects of braid, both old and new. Loomis' to Lightning Rods and everything in between including one custom.
  16. Lol on both counts. I think we should have fished the spring Classic Sunday. Only took 13 for first and 11 for second. Have to believe we could have easily matched that ? Bite should get real good real quick out there with warm weather finally arriving toward end of week.
  17. Stayed on the bank today due to a lack of time. Found that magic water temperature we've been discussing along with a good stain (still clearing from muddy) and managed 38 in just a couple hours doing just what I mentioned in the bank fishing thread. Nothing big, but I would have lit up ScoreTracker Live in an MLF competition with "scorable" bass
  18. I think a lot of the variation seen with the latter set was the fact that the initial test (source data) used two different knots to attach his lines, which while well intentioned, is questionable in approach. The first data set, while nicely analyzed using a different methodology, just used an (arguably) wrong choice of graph (Note - I'm not a trained statistician, but I work with a bunch of them ). Enjoyed the analysis though ?
  19. I wrote this a while back, but still pretty much spot on in my mind. YMMV. A little lengthy, but... Long before I ever got a boat, I bank fished. I loved to fish, and this was my only option. I chased after anything and everything, whatever would bite. But the bass fishing bug quickly bit me, and it wasn’t long after that that I contracted ‘bass tournament fever’. While I could count on being paired with a boater in my club, and could occasionally hook a ride on the off weekend, most of my trips were spent at the local ponds and reservoirs walking the shoreline trying to learn to catch bass. Some of the easiest to fish and most accessible banks were riprap covered, and I coined the name “rock hopper” to refer to myself and this style of fishing. Even now I refer to bank fishermen as ‘rock hoppers’ after those early days. I literally put in hundreds of bank trips to those waters, and still to this day I spend lots of time fishing from the bank. Due to time constraints and convenience, I probably logged 75-100 bank days each of the past couple years and more when I didn’t have a boat. I have probably caught thousands of bass from the bank and would like to pass on some of the observations and conclusions I have made during these endeavors. NOT CASTING TO OR ALONG THE BANK – This is far and away the biggest mistake I see most bank bound bassers make. The old observation about noticing ‘bank fishermen cast out towards the boats’ and why ‘boat fishermen cast in toward the shore’ is really true. Bass, by nature, are largely shallow water fish. They are also very cover oriented. When you combine these two concepts you have the basis for the start of an approach. In most of the lakes I fish, the best cover is along the bank. And the best way to fish that cover is to cast parallel, or nearly so, down a bank. Sometimes, just short pitches are all it takes. Why waste your time throwing out into the middle of the lake when so many fish are at your feet? The only time I throw out into deeper water (say >45 degrees off bank) is if I’m fishing a point or a known piece of structure, or in the dead of winter. Other than that, all casts are within 10’ of the shoreline. The clearer the water or the more open the shoreline, the longer and more parallel the casts. In heavy cover or small openings, small pitches and flips will suffice. Any piece of cover, no matter how insignificant gets a cast. Rocks, drains, washed in logs, weeds, lay downs, docks, you name it. Just be quiet and still and you’ll be surprised how many fish you’ll catch within 10’ of yourself. COVER WATER – Mistake number two is standing in one spot for half an hour or more and making cast after cast. Have you ever noticed how most bass boaters are always on the trolling motor covering water? If you accept the fact that most fish you’re chasing are shallow water object oriented, then probability says that the more water and spots you can cover the greater your odds of running into an aggressive (read biting) fish. This is especially important when first learning a body of water. The more water you cover the more spots (holding areas) you’ll discover. I will typically make 3-5 casts from a given area on the bank and then move 20-40’ down the bank for the next 3-5 casts. On and on it goes. You can easily cover a couple miles of bank in just a few hours. Remember, you're trying to find as many spots and as many bass as you can. Don’t wait for them to come to you, go to them. USE ONLY ONE ROD AND LURE – How many times have you seen this "mistake" made? Someone bass fishing from shore with a big tackle box or two, dragging 3 outfits through the woods, then casting a lure for 20-30 minutes at a spot, then digging into his box and changing to another lure, only to repeat the process. At this rate you might only fish 2 or 3 spots in a day. This usually doesn’t work well. The largest tackle box I ever carry with me is a tiny, flat drop-down that goes around your waist and attaches to your belt. Often times it is only an old lure box with a couple extra baits or a Ziploc bag stuffed into a pocket. There are several advantages to this. One, it lets you cover water by not wasting time changing baits, thinking they’ll hit something else better. Another is that it makes you more mobile. Mobility rules from the bank. Anymore, I’ll frequently fish an entire trip without a lure change. As long as you pay attention to retying when appropriate, you’ll rarely lose too many baits. Remember, you’re fishing shallow cover close to the bank. Most times, even if you do hang, you can reach out and unsnag lures that get stuck. As a side note here for those of you fishing small ponds regularly, use a different lure each trip. I had the good fortune of having 5 ponds located within a subdivision I lived in. The theory of fish becoming conditioned is definitely true, especially in these smaller bodies of water. I can’t count the number of times I’ve proven this to myself. Day one I’ll go out and catch 30 bass. If I go back out the next day with the same lure, my results will be cut in half. By the time I try this a third or fourth day, I might only catch a few. These fish get used to seeing the same bait day after day, so change up! Try a crankbait one trip, a topwater the next. Jigs on the third trip and maybe worms after that. After a week or two of not seeing the same bait twice you can usually go back in with the original bait and they’ll bite it well. FISH THE CONDITIONS – At first, this might not make much sense. Or maybe it’s too obvious. I’m referring to choosing the bait you throw based on the weather and water conditions you are faced with. It is usually best to not randomly select baits. Base your lure choice on weather conditions first, water (lake) conditions second and always keeping seasonal patterns in mind. For example, if you are getting ready to head out and you’re dealing with a sunny, frontal day, choose baits like jigs, worms, tubes, or single spins. On the other hand, if you have cloudy and windy conditions, maybe pack spinnerbaits, swimming grubs, shallow crankbaits, buzz baits, etc. Once you get to the lake, or if you already know what conditions to expect (water and cover), then use those to fine-tune your selections. Things like brighter colors, larger baits, or noisemakers in stained water and thinner, natural colored baits in clearer water. Likewise, if you are fishing open water conditions use grubs, crankbaits, top waters and such versus baits like jigs, worms, Senkos, single spins and so forth for heavy cover situations. TIME YOUR FISHING – This is another one that may slip by most people. The best time to go fishing is whenever you can, no doubt about that. But whenever possible, choose the days and times you get to fish based on conditions. This little tip will truly maximize the number of bites you’ll get in a day. For example, everyone knows that bass generally seem to bite best first thing in the morning or right before dark, typical low light conditions. But they also bite extremely well on a good cloudy day with an approaching storm. Days with a dropping barometer come to mind, as do windy days. Try and avoid those nice, sunny, post frontal days if you can. This tactic also increases the odds of having more room for you to fish, as most bank fishermen don’t like to put up with inclement weather. Another example of this tactic relates to time of year. Those extremely tough clear water lakes and ponds will give up some surprisingly good fish in the cold-water period or at night through the summer. Vice-versa, inherently murky water lakes usually aren’t all that great real early and late in the year, but can be great with the warmer weather and water conditions. If you have your choice of a couple different types of water to fish, choose according to which fits the given conditions and seasonal patterns best. Finally, those odd times that create short windows of opportunity. The perfect example of this is a couple of the small ponds I fish. Almost without fail, one of the most consistent patterns is fishing the incoming flats or drains after a good rain. While you can always seem to count on one or two from these areas, these areas become incredible spots when you are able to coincide your trip with fresh, incoming water. Spots that only give up a fish or two now may give up 5 or 10 fish without moving, sometimes more. The bass realize this is a temporary feeding opportunity and act accordingly. You should too. FISH SPOTS (the exception) – Earlier I said covering water is the preferred tactic. This is true, especially when fishing a new body of water that is not familiar to you. However, with enough time on a given lake or pond, certain spots will seem to consistently give up a fish or two most every trip. These areas or spots are worth taking a little extra time on before moving on. As I mentioned, small drains on my ponds always seem to hold bass consistently and I will frequently spend up to 20 minutes or more fishing these areas. The general rule of thumb is if you catch a bass on a spot, it is worth taking a few extra minutes to thoroughly scout the area. Sometimes the reason is obvious such as the drain example. Many times though you won’t be able to identify what it is about the particular location or bank. Some just seem to hold fish better than others. Your job is to be aware of these areas as they unfold to you and fish them appropriately. Then feel free to keep scooting along the bank between these hotspots. These tips have proven themselves to be pretty consistent over many of the waters I bank fished through the years. Try utilizing some of these suggestions the next time you head out from the bank and see if they don’t increase the number of fish that you catch.
  20. And with better data, we see better graphs, and what seems to me like a nice positive correlation between breaking strength and line diameter without all the noise and variability in the first data set, regardless of how often the manufacturers choose to mislabel their lines. Nice job...
  21. Mislabeling is a very big issue with many European brands of line, but even US brands vary considerably. Stated diameters are much better than labeled breaking strength, but you'll still see variations of up to ~25% in diameter, and up to ~75% in breaking strain (average = 5 and 30% respectively depending on data looked at).
  22. So, manufacturers stated diameters and rated strengths? That's a big leap of faith amd would explain the ugliness of the chart (data is what it is - no offense to the compiler). You have a different take?
  23. The magic number for me is 33 degrees, because when the water reaches that point, my casts are no longer landing on the ice
  24. A few from the mud Thursday. Most of the lake has about 1-2" of visibility, but found some areas with 3-6 inches and that's where these came from. Every decent sized body of water within about 100 miles of me is flooded and muddy right now from the 12" of snow and 3+ inches of rain we've had over the past two weeks. A couple lakes even closed due to the conditions.
  25. These tests have been done before and the data is out there, hence my suggestion to focus on the two things you really have control of to overcome them - line diameter and cast distances. Tom's point about technique to overcome distance plays into this as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.