I concede, there is no contest. Texas wins hands down. TX has many huge lakes to choose from plus when flying in it seems like everybody has a private pond. The state of TX actualy likes fisherman and encourages them to fish and hunt. Their lakes are open all the time. and I believe you only have to buy a licsence and not launch fees and daily permits. There are more 10lbers caught in TX and the bass fishing is better(easier) and far less preasured. They even stcok geneticaly superior bass fry into the lakes. Its not even close. TX is a much better place to be if your a bass fisherman, or hunter.
In So Cal our lakes are super deep and super clear, They ususaly have half of them closed at any given time and they are always crying about low water. We have to buy a licsence, launch fee, daily permit, and sometimes pay for parking too. Some lakes are only open 4 days a week and only a few allow night fishing. Soo when we decide we are going fishing on say a Wed we only have a couple places to choose from. That means everbody else in So Cal are fishing in the same couple lakes that Wed. The water dist would rather not even let us fish the lakes. Our lakes are the most preasured lakes in the country. The bass are spooky and hard to catch. When the lakes do get stocked with trout the shorelines are crowded with shore anglers so you cant even get your boat in close. Our laked do not get stocked with bass. The only thing CA has going for it, is huge bass. There arent that many of them but they are here. Other then that TX is 10X better. My mom lives in TX and she keeps trying to get me to move but i was born in So Cal and I dont want leave. But I can honestly say TX is a much more fisher/hunter friendly state and they dont have all the stupid politics that we do.