This brings up another question. Is the term "good" defining size or numbers?
Does targeting and catching (5) 3lb+ bass over an 8 hour day make one a better angler than targeting and catching 50 dinks over an 8 hour day? Frankly, if I'm not in a tourney, I would rather have the numbers than the size. This is dictated by where and how I fish.
No argument, a big jig will catch less fish than a 5" senko or a crankbait. When I fish buddy tourneys on my home water, I will throw a jig in one form or another all day, or until my son, who is experimenting with baits, figures out a pattern. If he can establish a pattern, then we stick with it. On a new lake, I'll switch between a jig and a jerkbait fishing structure again, while my son experiments with different baits trying to establish a pattern.
If I'm fun fishing or meat fishing alone, or with my dad, the thought process is different. I do the experimenting to find fish, then stick to my guns, until I've fished out the school.
I didn't get skunked this year. I got some big pike and walleye, but didn't break the 4lb mark for a bass. Does that make me good? Does it really matter?