The test reel for the PQ 5-Year Challenge hit its fifth service anniversary on October 26 (today), thus completing the 5 Year Challenge. The reel is still in service, most recently this morning.
Background: Briefly, the 5-Year Challenge resulted from some board members expressing the opinion that the PQ reel was a “one-season” reel (it would be completely worn out after a "season"), and certainly wouldn’t stay in an angler’s arsenal for as long as 5 years. The subject reel was used to test those opinions.
Posts 2 through 6 of this thread reproduce the content of the earlier reports. Below are links to the other threads in this series in the event that someone is interested in the previous commentary related to these test reports. :
BPS Pro Qualifier BC Reel – 5 Year Challenge – Interim Report (12-7-2011)
BPS Pro Qualifier BC Reel – 5-Year Challenge – A Speed-Bump On The Road To Paradise
BPS Pro Qualifier BC Reel – 5-Year Challenge – Three Years In
BPS Pro Qualifier BC Reel – 5-Year Challenge – Time To Pay The Piper!
BPS Pro Qualifier BC Reel – 5-Year Challenge – 4 Years Down, 1 To Go
Current Statistics: Reel placed into service: 26 Oct. 2009 Months of service as of this report: 60 Number of “catch days” (days when fish were caught with this reel): 502 Number of fish caught: 1114 Baits used for the 1114 fish caught: Lipless Cranks - 804, Misc. Hardbaits - 21, Soft Plastics - 289
Biggest fish caught: 48.6 lb grass carp Biggest bass caught: 9.5 lb LMB Number of cycles (casts & retrieves): 55,000+ (see note)
Note: Number of cycles is based on catch data, not on total days/hours of use (see Post #2 or the linked 12-7-2011 thread for how the metrics were established). The reel was used many days where no fish were caught, especially during the winter months. I fish this reel nearly every day and actual number of use days probably easily exceeds 1000. Actual number of cycles could easily be in excess of 75,000. As I have mentioned in the last several reports, the passage of years of time has made it difficult to calculate the number of accrued cycles on this reel due to the significant number of days where it is fished, but no fish are caught – resulting in thousands of uncounted cycles.
The biggest fish over the 5 year period - 48 pound grass carp:
Biggest bass caught over the 5 year period - 9.5 pound LMB:
Significant Events In the Last Year: The reel has been mostly trouble-free for the past year but certain operational aspects of the reel (clutch actuation, centrifugal braking) are being compromised due to increasing wear (see the Current Condition section below).
The biggest bass caught with the reel during the past year was this 25", but emaciated, 6.28 pound LMB:
Previous Maintenance/Repairs:
December 2010 – Annual cleaning. December 2011 – Annual cleaning. Replacement of line guide pawl at about 26 months of use. Interesting factoid – the pawl had probably made at least 320,000 passes across the worm shaft at the time of replacement. July 2012 – Repairs / cleaning (see Post #3 of this thread or the "A Speed-Bump On The Road To Paradise" thread linked above): Repair 1 – debris jammed the line guide pawl causing the pawl to create a burr on the worm shaft. Filed off the burr and thoroughly cleaned the reel. Repair 2 – centrifugal brake wear – replaced the palm-side sideplate assembly.
January 2013 - Repair / cleaning / upgrade (see Post #5 of this thread or the "Time To Pay The Piper" thread linked above):
Repair – replaced the worm shaft, line guide pawl, and two idler gears.
Upgrade – replaced the stock drag washers with Carbontex washers.
October 2013 – Annual cleaning.
October 2014 - Annual cleaning.
Current Condition: The condition of the internal parts of the reel have been mostly the same for several years. There is wear on the clutch return pawl (from impact by the rachet) that doesn't affect function, the rear and side surfaces of the clutch thumb bar have started to wear through the plastic plating, the brake drum and brake shoes show considerable (nearly unserviceable) wear, and the grooving on the frame reported last year has increased. Externally, the reel has some minor rash on the top of the reel, very little on the sides. As I mentioned last year, the spool bearings are noisy but spin well when cleaned. If you are familiar with the whine made by Shimano Digital Control reels during a cast…that’s sorta the noise I hear when I cast this PQ – you get the audio experience of a DC reel without the high cost… Otherwise, the reel is fishable, but it’s readily apparent that you are not fishing with a new, tight reel. As I mention with every report, this reel has not been babied, and has often been rode hard and put away wet. In winter, the reel is frequently rode hard and put away frozen, with ice still in the line guide when taking the rod out of the trunk of the car. The reel has been placed on the ground hundreds of times while I measure/weigh fish, providing the opportunity for grit and debris to enter the worm shaft area and around the clutch bar - contributing to some of the wear in these areas.
Handle Knob Wear: While the reel has little exterior rash, some of the markings are wearing off. The real exterior indicator of the amount of use the reel has seen are the handle knobs. These EVA knobs have been on the reel for only three years and the grooving has nearly disappeared from wear:
Centrifugal Braking System Wear: This is the Achilles heel of this reel. The brass brake drum is soft, and wears easily, even when kept reasonably clean. BPS does NOT list the drum as a lubrication point - but they should. The captive brake shoes are small, wear easily, and are not available as spare parts. The only way to get replacement brake shoes is to purchase the entire spool assembly. I had already replaced the palm-side sideplate assembly in July 2012 due to brake drum wear. Now, 27 months later, the brake drum grooving is back. The brake shoes are original to the reel, but have now worn to the point where they are becoming ineffective, especially in combination with the brake drum grooving. Whereas when the reel was new, I would use two, sometimes only one, centrifugal brake, I now have to use four, sometimes 5 to achieve the same braking.
Current brake drum grooving:
New brake shoe:
Current condition brake shoe:
Frame Wear: This was first reported last year and the wear has increased since then. In the photo below, note the vertical grooves (indicated by the red arrows) cut in the frame by the “legs” on the bottom of the clutch bar - this entire area of the frame should be completely flat. The clutch bar is a plastic part but it does have some sort of plating on it. That plating, with perhaps the addition of grit and grime under the bar, have been enough to actually groove the aluminum frame. Thus, plastic trumps aluminum in this case. This condition results in the clutch bar being loose and making clutch operation somewhat dodgy at times. This condition potentially could be a source of an eventual frame crack.
Summary:
After 60 months of use, where are we at?
Parts replacements:
Parts replaced due to wear: (necessary) 1 line guide pawl, (optional) original drag washers
Parts replaced due to damage caused by debris: (necessary) worm shaft, line guide pawl, (optional) idler gears
Parts replaced (probably) due to my failure to maintain: palm-side sideplate assembly (to replace the brake drum)
Parts ordered and installed but did not fix the problem: clutch bar and shims
Lessons learned:
Keep the brake drum CLEAN and appy lube to the drum to prevent premature wear.
Accept that the dual-braking system (DBS), along with its advantages, has some disadvantages - added complexity and potential wear to parts that are not readily replaceable - like the brake shoes.
Closing:
That's it - the final report of the 5 Year Challenge. I'll leave it up to each board member to compare the usage that this reel has received, to their own fishing patterns, to determine how this reel would fare in their own service.
For me? Well, the reel cost $80, caught 1114 fish, at a cost per fish of 7.1 cents. It reeled in my current LMB 9.5lb PB. It reeled in multiple grass carp in the 35-50 pound range. Value delivered for me. AND, the reel is not done working for living. There is a winter coming up and this reel will fish through the winter, as long as the braking system holds up and the frame doesn't crack. Next spring, the PQ will likely be retired to a nice warm place in my display cabinet.
The near future for the test PQ...
Epilogue:
Five years ago, the PQ was an outstanding choice for a value, workhorse baitcasting reel. Offered in four ratios, in both right- and left-hand, eight models total. Something for everyone. However, time, and technology, keep marching on. Today, the PQ still offers value at it's price point, and this test has proven that it is capable of offering long service. BUT, there are other competitors in the playing field to challenge the PQ, and BPS is falling behind on it's bread-and-butter model. While not a competitor at factory list price, the Daiwa Tatula at the "deal" prices is a game changer and something that BPS will have a hard time competing with. It will be interesting to see what BPS develops as the successor to the current PQ. One thing for SURE, the 'ole Goose will not be running any more 5 year tests on any future model PQs!